Accounting approaches and challenges in large-scale afforestation projects: insights from the Billion Tree Afforestation Project, KP, Pakistan

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate accounting practices as intertwined technical, social and ethical mechanisms in a large-scale afforestation project in Pakistan – the Billion Tree Afforestation Project (BTAP). The study examines how accounting mediates accountability, participation and ethical stewardship in environmental governance, as well as the challenges faced and how they are overcome. Design/methodology/approach An interpretive extended case methodology, guided by Carnegie et al.’s (2021) tripartite conceptualisation of accounting, complemented by institutional and stakeholder perspectives, is used. Thematic analysis is used to analyse data from 29 semi-structured interviews, alongside project documentation, archival material and field observations. Findings Accounting in the BTAP operated simultaneously as a technical practice, social process and moral framing. Technically, it enabled monitoring and accountability and supported legitimacy claims, yet it also exposed tensions between bureaucratic demands for precise reporting and field-level realities. Socially, accounting structured participation and trust, but participatory arrangements sometimes became tokenistic when decision authority remained centralised. Morally, religious and ethical narratives helped mobilise stewardship, while at times redirecting attention away from institutional accountability. Together, these dynamics show accounting's performative, contested and potentially transformative role in environmental governance. Originality/value The study extends sustainability accounting theory by theorising how technical, social and moral dimensions interact and generate tensions in practice. It reframes technical accounting as a fragile credibility practice, social accounting as a negotiated arena of participation and power, and moral accounting as ethically charged yet ambivalent. In doing so, it develops accounting as a multi-dimensional social technology that mediates legitimacy, authority and accountability in sustainability governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-12-2024-7613
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting approaches and challenges in large-scale afforestation projects: insights from the Billion Tree Afforestation Project, KP, Pakistan

Khwaja Naveed, Murad Ali, Muhammad Bilal Farooq
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Accounting and Organizational Management
article

Accounting approaches and challenges in large-scale afforestation projects: insights from the Billion Tree Afforestation Project, KP, Pakistan

Khwaja Naveed, Murad Ali, Muhammad Bilal Farooq
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate accounting practices as intertwined technical, social and ethical mechanisms in a large-scale afforestation project in Pakistan – the Billion Tree Afforestation Project (BTAP). The study examines how accounting mediates accountability, participation and ethical stewardship in environmental governance, as well as the challenges faced and how they are overcome. Design/methodology/approach An interpretive extended case methodology, guided by Carnegie et al.’s (2021) tripartite conceptualisation of accounting, complemented by institutional and stakeholder perspectives, is used. Thematic analysis is used to analyse data from 29 semi-structured interviews, alongside project documentation, archival material and field observations. Findings Accounting in the BTAP operated simultaneously as a technical practice, social process and moral framing. Technically, it enabled monitoring and accountability and supported legitimacy claims, yet it also exposed tensions between bureaucratic demands for precise reporting and field-level realities. Socially, accounting structured participation and trust, but participatory arrangements sometimes became tokenistic when decision authority remained centralised. Morally, religious and ethical narratives helped mobilise stewardship, while at times redirecting attention away from institutional accountability. Together, these dynamics show accounting's performative, contested and potentially transformative role in environmental governance. Originality/value The study extends sustainability accounting theory by theorising how technical, social and moral dimensions interact and generate tensions in practice. It reframes technical accounting as a fragile credibility practice, social accounting as a negotiated arena of participation and power, and moral accounting as ethically charged yet ambivalent. In doing so, it develops accounting as a multi-dimensional social technology that mediates legitimacy, authority and accountability in sustainability governance.

Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
United Arab Emirates University (AE), Department of Forestry (MW), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Accounting and Organizational Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.