Translation-Invariant Quantum Algorithms for Ordered Search are Optimal

Ordered search is the task of finding an item in an ordered list using comparison queries. The best exact classical algorithm for this fundamental problem uses ⌈log 2 n ⌉ queries for a list of length n . Quantum computers can achieve a constant-factor speedup, but the best possible coefficient of log 2 n for exact quantum algorithms is only known to lie between (ln 2)/ π ≈ 0.221 and 4/log 2 605 ≈ 0.433. We consider a special class of translation-invariant algorithms with no workspace, introduced by Farhi, Goldstone, Gutmann, and Sipser, that has been used to find the best known upper bounds. First, we show that any bounded-error, k -query quantum algorithm for ordered search can be implemented by a k -query algorithm in this special class. Second, we use linear programming to show that the best exact 5-query quantum algorithm can search a list of length 7265, giving an ordered search algorithm that asymptotically uses 5log 7265 n ≈ 0.390log 2 n quantum queries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3800579
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation-Invariant Quantum Algorithms for Ordered Search are Optimal

Matt Kovacs-Deak, Andrew M. Childs, Luke Schaeffer, Joseph Carolan
ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Translation-Invariant Quantum Algorithms for Ordered Search are Optimal

Matt Kovacs-Deak, Andrew M. Childs, Luke Schaeffer, Joseph Carolan
article en

Abstract

Ordered search is the task of finding an item in an ordered list using comparison queries. The best exact classical algorithm for this fundamental problem uses ⌈log 2 n ⌉ queries for a list of length n . Quantum computers can achieve a constant-factor speedup, but the best possible coefficient of log 2 n for exact quantum algorithms is only known to lie between (ln 2)/ π ≈ 0.221 and 4/log 2 605 ≈ 0.433. We consider a special class of translation-invariant algorithms with no workspace, introduced by Farhi, Goldstone, Gutmann, and Sipser, that has been used to find the best known upper bounds. First, we show that any bounded-error, k -query quantum algorithm for ordered search can be implemented by a k -query algorithm in this special class. Second, we use linear programming to show that the best exact 5-query quantum algorithm can search a list of length 7265, giving an ordered search algorithm that asymptotically uses 5log 7265 n ≈ 0.390log 2 n quantum queries.

ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing
University of Waterloo (CA), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.