Management of miscarriage: a matter of choice? A mixed- methods research study in Northern Ireland

Miscarriage, defined in the United Kingdom as the loss of a pregnancy before 24 weeks’ gestation, remains the most common gestational complication, affecting 13–15% of all recognised pregnancies. Despite established NICE guidelines outlining three management options—expectant, medical, and surgical—little is known about how these approaches influence women’s emotional wellbeing or sense of autonomy. This mixed-methods study explored women’s experiences of miscarriage management and their emotional needs when attending hospital facilities in Northern Ireland (NI). A cross-sectional online survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted between January and April 2021. Participants (N = 723) were women aged over 16 years who had experienced a miscarriage in NI within the preceding five years. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative data were thematically analysed. Findings revealed that 42% of participants experienced expectant management, 14% medical, 28% surgical, and 16% a combination of treatments. Notably, 52% of respondents reported that they were not given a choice of management, with 36% stating that healthcare professionals made decisions without clear explanation. Among those who were not offered a choice, 40% were dissatisfied with the information received, and 44% felt insufficient time was allowed to discuss options. Conversely, women who were offered choice reported higher satisfaction, clearer communication, and greater perceived emotional support. Thematic analysis identified three central themes from the qualitative data: choice and autonomy, importance of being informed, and time for decision-making. The study highlights a gap between national guidance advocating informed, patient-centred care and women’s lived experiences of miscarriage management in NI. Lack of autonomy and inadequate communication were associated with emotional distress and feelings of disempowerment. Healthcare professionals should ensure women are provided with comprehensive information, sufficient time for decision-making, and genuine choice in treatment whenever medically feasible. Further research is required to examine the long-term psychological impact of different miscarriage management approaches and to inform best practice in compassionate, patient-centred care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reproductive Health
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-026-02316-x
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management of miscarriage: a matter of choice? A mixed- methods research study in Northern Ireland

G Mitchell, M Galeotti, Á Aventin, M Tomlinson
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Management of miscarriage: a matter of choice? A mixed- methods research study in Northern Ireland

G Mitchell, M Galeotti, Á Aventin, M Tomlinson
article en

Abstract

Miscarriage, defined in the United Kingdom as the loss of a pregnancy before 24 weeks’ gestation, remains the most common gestational complication, affecting 13–15% of all recognised pregnancies. Despite established NICE guidelines outlining three management options—expectant, medical, and surgical—little is known about how these approaches influence women’s emotional wellbeing or sense of autonomy. This mixed-methods study explored women’s experiences of miscarriage management and their emotional needs when attending hospital facilities in Northern Ireland (NI). A cross-sectional online survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted between January and April 2021. Participants (N = 723) were women aged over 16 years who had experienced a miscarriage in NI within the preceding five years. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative data were thematically analysed. Findings revealed that 42% of participants experienced expectant management, 14% medical, 28% surgical, and 16% a combination of treatments. Notably, 52% of respondents reported that they were not given a choice of management, with 36% stating that healthcare professionals made decisions without clear explanation. Among those who were not offered a choice, 40% were dissatisfied with the information received, and 44% felt insufficient time was allowed to discuss options. Conversely, women who were offered choice reported higher satisfaction, clearer communication, and greater perceived emotional support. Thematic analysis identified three central themes from the qualitative data: choice and autonomy, importance of being informed, and time for decision-making. The study highlights a gap between national guidance advocating informed, patient-centred care and women’s lived experiences of miscarriage management in NI. Lack of autonomy and inadequate communication were associated with emotional distress and feelings of disempowerment. Healthcare professionals should ensure women are provided with comprehensive information, sufficient time for decision-making, and genuine choice in treatment whenever medically feasible. Further research is required to examine the long-term psychological impact of different miscarriage management approaches and to inform best practice in compassionate, patient-centred care.

Reproductive Health
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.