Emotions and sentiment in social media information sharing: a systematic review across domains and platforms

Purpose Since the widespread uptake of social media in the 2010s, research on emotion and sentiment in online sharing has grown rapidly across various fields. Yet, this expansion lacks standardized methods and shared concepts, resulting in fragmented evidence and even contradictory findings on the direction of these effects. No systematic synthesis across fields currently exists. This review fills that gap by offering the first comprehensive overview of findings, scope, and methodologies at a pivotal moment before large language models reshape this research landscape. Design/methodology/approach The systematic review identified 136 studies from 1,181 search results retrieved via Web of Science and Scopus in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Given the heterogeneity of the studies, the synthesis is presented in narrative form. Findings Emotions and sentiment, in general, increase the popularity of information across platforms. The effect is found most consistently for negative discrete emotions, such as anger, anxiety, sadness and fear. Positivity bias is often identified in health communication, while negativity bias is prevalent in political communication. Going forward, the field should focus on sampling across platforms, greater linguistic diversity, and analysis of visual material. Originality/value The systematic review provides the first synthesis of a rapidly expanding field relevant to scholars across disciplines. It identifies potential sources of variance in the results and highlights methodological heterogeneity and identifies paths for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Online Information Review
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-06-2025-0472
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotions and sentiment in social media information sharing: a systematic review across domains and platforms

Petra de Place Bak
Online Information Review
Mental Health via Writing
article

Emotions and sentiment in social media information sharing: a systematic review across domains and platforms

Petra de Place Bak
article en

Abstract

Purpose Since the widespread uptake of social media in the 2010s, research on emotion and sentiment in online sharing has grown rapidly across various fields. Yet, this expansion lacks standardized methods and shared concepts, resulting in fragmented evidence and even contradictory findings on the direction of these effects. No systematic synthesis across fields currently exists. This review fills that gap by offering the first comprehensive overview of findings, scope, and methodologies at a pivotal moment before large language models reshape this research landscape. Design/methodology/approach The systematic review identified 136 studies from 1,181 search results retrieved via Web of Science and Scopus in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Given the heterogeneity of the studies, the synthesis is presented in narrative form. Findings Emotions and sentiment, in general, increase the popularity of information across platforms. The effect is found most consistently for negative discrete emotions, such as anger, anxiety, sadness and fear. Positivity bias is often identified in health communication, while negativity bias is prevalent in political communication. Going forward, the field should focus on sampling across platforms, greater linguistic diversity, and analysis of visual material. Originality/value The systematic review provides the first synthesis of a rapidly expanding field relevant to scholars across disciplines. It identifies potential sources of variance in the results and highlights methodological heterogeneity and identifies paths for future research.

Online Information Review
Danish School of Media and Journalism (DK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.