Comparative Study of Predictive and Rule-Based Lighting Control Algorithms for Context-Aware Energy Optimization

This study presents a comparative analysis of rule-based and predictive lighting control algorithms in commercial building environments, focusing on their responsiveness, accuracy, and energy efficiency. A full-scale indoor testbed comprising nine lighting zones was constructed, and both algorithms were applied under identical conditions over a 28-day period. The predictive control method employed a lightweight first-order Markov model to forecast user movement paths and proactively control lighting activation. Quantitative performance indicators—including CV(RMSE), NMBE, Time to Responsive Dimming (TRD), and Redundant Activation Count (RAC)—were utilized in accordance with ASHRAE Guideline 14-2023. The experimental results showed that the predictive algorithm outperformed the rule-based approach, reducing lighting error by 39.4%, improving TRD by 68%, and achieving a 15.2% reduction in energy consumption. These findings suggest that predictive control offers significant advantages in user-centric lighting management, particularly for retrofit commercial spaces and edge-device environments. This study provides a practical reference for selecting intelligent lighting control strategies that balance energy savings and user comfort.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Korean Institute of Illuminating and Electrical Installation Engineers
Published
2026-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5207/jieie.2026.40.1.13
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Predictive and Rule-Based Lighting Control Algorithms for Context-Aware Energy Optimization

Jongbin Park, Seo-Hoon Kim
Journal of the Korean Institute of Illuminating and Electrical Installation Engineers
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Comparative Study of Predictive and Rule-Based Lighting Control Algorithms for Context-Aware Energy Optimization

Jongbin Park, Seo-Hoon Kim
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of rule-based and predictive lighting control algorithms in commercial building environments, focusing on their responsiveness, accuracy, and energy efficiency. A full-scale indoor testbed comprising nine lighting zones was constructed, and both algorithms were applied under identical conditions over a 28-day period. The predictive control method employed a lightweight first-order Markov model to forecast user movement paths and proactively control lighting activation. Quantitative performance indicators—including CV(RMSE), NMBE, Time to Responsive Dimming (TRD), and Redundant Activation Count (RAC)—were utilized in accordance with ASHRAE Guideline 14-2023. The experimental results showed that the predictive algorithm outperformed the rule-based approach, reducing lighting error by 39.4%, improving TRD by 68%, and achieving a 15.2% reduction in energy consumption. These findings suggest that predictive control offers significant advantages in user-centric lighting management, particularly for retrofit commercial spaces and edge-device environments. This study provides a practical reference for selecting intelligent lighting control strategies that balance energy savings and user comfort.

Journal of the Korean Institute of Illuminating and Electrical Installation EngineersVol. 40(1)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.