“It’s Us against Them”: Populist Rule and Electoral Violence

Abstract In recent times, populist leaders and parties have seen tremendous electoral success globally. However, a considerable number of these elections have been highly contentious with some even leading to violence. Yet, we know relatively little about the relationship between populist leadership and electoral violence. Drawing on theories of jointly produced violence, social identity, as well as populism and polarization, this article addresses this gap in the literature. Using data from over 100 countries between 1990 to 2018, empirical results from OLS estimations indicate that populist leadership is positively associated with government-sponsored electoral violence. The result is robust to several alternative model specifications and different measurements. In addition, the analysis shows that populist-induced electoral violence is not conditioned by a leader’s traditional ideological leaning. These findings have important implications for elections, especially in the context of the global rise of populism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Security Studies
Published
2026-01-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogag002
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It’s Us against Them”: Populist Rule and Electoral Violence

Ernest Mensah Akuamoah
Journal of Global Security Studies
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

“It’s Us against Them”: Populist Rule and Electoral Violence

Ernest Mensah Akuamoah
article en

Abstract

Abstract In recent times, populist leaders and parties have seen tremendous electoral success globally. However, a considerable number of these elections have been highly contentious with some even leading to violence. Yet, we know relatively little about the relationship between populist leadership and electoral violence. Drawing on theories of jointly produced violence, social identity, as well as populism and polarization, this article addresses this gap in the literature. Using data from over 100 countries between 1990 to 2018, empirical results from OLS estimations indicate that populist leadership is positively associated with government-sponsored electoral violence. The result is robust to several alternative model specifications and different measurements. In addition, the analysis shows that populist-induced electoral violence is not conditioned by a leader’s traditional ideological leaning. These findings have important implications for elections, especially in the context of the global rise of populism.

Journal of Global Security StudiesVol. 11(1)
Australian National University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.