Tariff: The Most Beautiful Word in the Dictionary?

ABSTRACT We consider the welfare impacts of US tariff policy at levels proposed by President Donald J. Trump. General‐equilibrium simulations under a widely used transparent one‐sector trade model reveal sizable US welfare losses. When we extend the model to include bilateral firm selection and high resolution input–output linkages, the US losses escalate. We adopt a theory‐with‐numbers method to perform comparative static simulations over President Trump's stated tariff goals and consider retaliatory responses. Unified symmetric global retaliation to US protection, at the level of Trump's proposal, places 270% of the global efficiency loss on the US, leading to gains for all other regions except Canada. Our new results are dependent on both our incorporation of data (beyond trade flows and trade elasticities) and our structural extensions to consider bilateral selection of firms. We provide a foundation for our results in a computational analysis of optimal tariffs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Economics
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.70043
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tariff: The Most Beautiful Word in the Dictionary?

Christine A. McDaniel, Edward J. Balistreri, Suraiya Binte Ali
Review of International Economics
Global trade and economics
article

Tariff: The Most Beautiful Word in the Dictionary?

Christine A. McDaniel, Edward J. Balistreri, Suraiya Binte Ali
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We consider the welfare impacts of US tariff policy at levels proposed by President Donald J. Trump. General‐equilibrium simulations under a widely used transparent one‐sector trade model reveal sizable US welfare losses. When we extend the model to include bilateral firm selection and high resolution input–output linkages, the US losses escalate. We adopt a theory‐with‐numbers method to perform comparative static simulations over President Trump's stated tariff goals and consider retaliatory responses. Unified symmetric global retaliation to US protection, at the level of Trump's proposal, places 270% of the global efficiency loss on the US, leading to gains for all other regions except Canada. Our new results are dependent on both our incorporation of data (beyond trade flows and trade elasticities) and our structural extensions to consider bilateral selection of firms. We provide a foundation for our results in a computational analysis of optimal tariffs.

Review of International Economics
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), World Bank (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.