Physical activity and the risk of cataract and age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Physical activity has been associated with a lower risk of cataract and age-related macular degeneration in some studies; however, the available evidence has not been fully consistent. We conducted a meta-analysis of cohort studies to clarify the association between physical activity and cataract and age-related macular degeneration. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant prospective studies up to September 18, 2025. Random effects models were used to calculate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between physical activity and the risk of cataract and age-related macular degeneration. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) criteria was used to evaluate the strength of evidence. A total of 10 cohort studies (8 publications) with 163,065 cases and 1,914,137 participants were included in the analysis of physical activity and cataract and 14 cohort studies (9 publications) with 17,653 cases and 566,895 participants were included in the analysis of age-related macular degeneration. The summary RR for high vs. low physical activity and cataract was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86–0.94, I2 = 74%, n = 10) and for age-related macular degeneration was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84–1.01, I2 = 60%, n = 14). The summary RR per 20 MET-hours/week increment in leisure-time physical activity was 0.91 (0.84–0.99, I2 = 66%, n = 3) for cataract and 0.92 (0.74–1.13, I2 = 48%, n = 3) for age-related macular degeneration, and there was no indication of nonlinear dose-response relationships (pnonlinearity=0.32 and pnonlinearity=0.34, respectively). There was no indication of publication bias. The evidence (judging the likelihood of causality) using WCRF criteria was judged as probable for cataract and limited-no conclusion for age-related macular degeneration. This meta-analysis provides further support for an inverse association between physical activity and risk of cataract, but an association with age-related macular degeneration was less evident. Any further studies should clarify the dose-response relationship and associations between different domains of physical activity in relation to these outcomes. These findings support public health recommendations to the general population to be physically active.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-026-04721-z
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical activity and the risk of cataract and age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Sepideh Soltani, D. Aune, Ahmad Jayedi, Fatemeh Rezaei et al.
BMC Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Physical activity and the risk of cataract and age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Sepideh Soltani, D. Aune, Ahmad Jayedi, Fatemeh Rezaei, Asma Kazemi, Michael F. Leitzmann
article en

Abstract

Physical activity has been associated with a lower risk of cataract and age-related macular degeneration in some studies; however, the available evidence has not been fully consistent. We conducted a meta-analysis of cohort studies to clarify the association between physical activity and cataract and age-related macular degeneration. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant prospective studies up to September 18, 2025. Random effects models were used to calculate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between physical activity and the risk of cataract and age-related macular degeneration. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) criteria was used to evaluate the strength of evidence. A total of 10 cohort studies (8 publications) with 163,065 cases and 1,914,137 participants were included in the analysis of physical activity and cataract and 14 cohort studies (9 publications) with 17,653 cases and 566,895 participants were included in the analysis of age-related macular degeneration. The summary RR for high vs. low physical activity and cataract was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86–0.94, I2 = 74%, n = 10) and for age-related macular degeneration was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84–1.01, I2 = 60%, n = 14). The summary RR per 20 MET-hours/week increment in leisure-time physical activity was 0.91 (0.84–0.99, I2 = 66%, n = 3) for cataract and 0.92 (0.74–1.13, I2 = 48%, n = 3) for age-related macular degeneration, and there was no indication of nonlinear dose-response relationships (pnonlinearity=0.32 and pnonlinearity=0.34, respectively). There was no indication of publication bias. The evidence (judging the likelihood of causality) using WCRF criteria was judged as probable for cataract and limited-no conclusion for age-related macular degeneration. This meta-analysis provides further support for an inverse association between physical activity and risk of cataract, but an association with age-related macular degeneration was less evident. Any further studies should clarify the dose-response relationship and associations between different domains of physical activity in relation to these outcomes. These findings support public health recommendations to the general population to be physically active.

BMC Ophthalmology
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR), Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IR), Jahrom University of Medical Sciences (IR), Cancer Registry of Norway (NO), Imperial College London (GB), University of Regensburg (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.