Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting early rupture and rebleeding risk after intracranial aneurysm embolization

Objective To construct and validate a nomogram for predicting early rupture rebleeding risk after intracranial aneurysm embolization, providing a precise clinical assessment tool. Methods Clinical data from 274 patients (March 2022–February 2025) were retrospectively analyzed, divided into a training set ( n = 192) and validation set ( n = 82) (7:3 ratio). Univariate/multivariate logistic regression identified independent risk factors. The nomogram’s performance was evaluated via ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA. Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that larger aneurysm diameter, wider neck, higher preoperative Hunt-Hess grade, incomplete embolization, and poor postoperative blood pressure control were independent risk factors for early rupture rebleeding after embolization (all p < 0.05). The constructed nomogram demonstrated good calibration and discriminative ability in both the training and validation sets, with C-index values of 0.873 and 0.738, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were 0.870 (95%CI: 0.790–0.951) and 0.739 (95%CI: 0.456–1.000) with corresponding sensitivities and specificities of 0.812, 0.840 and 0.667, 0.902, respectively. Decision curve analysis indicated significant clinical utility within specific threshold probability ranges. Conclusion The multifactor nomogram exhibits strong predictive performance, facilitating early identification of high-risk patients and personalized treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neurology
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1727678
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting early rupture and rebleeding risk after intracranial aneurysm embolization

Fen Yu, Wenbo Xu, Pu Du, Guohao Chen
Frontiers in Neurology
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
article

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting early rupture and rebleeding risk after intracranial aneurysm embolization

Fen Yu, Wenbo Xu, Pu Du, Guohao Chen
article en

Abstract

Objective To construct and validate a nomogram for predicting early rupture rebleeding risk after intracranial aneurysm embolization, providing a precise clinical assessment tool. Methods Clinical data from 274 patients (March 2022–February 2025) were retrospectively analyzed, divided into a training set ( n = 192) and validation set ( n = 82) (7:3 ratio). Univariate/multivariate logistic regression identified independent risk factors. The nomogram’s performance was evaluated via ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA. Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that larger aneurysm diameter, wider neck, higher preoperative Hunt-Hess grade, incomplete embolization, and poor postoperative blood pressure control were independent risk factors for early rupture rebleeding after embolization (all p < 0.05). The constructed nomogram demonstrated good calibration and discriminative ability in both the training and validation sets, with C-index values of 0.873 and 0.738, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were 0.870 (95%CI: 0.790–0.951) and 0.739 (95%CI: 0.456–1.000) with corresponding sensitivities and specificities of 0.812, 0.840 and 0.667, 0.902, respectively. Decision curve analysis indicated significant clinical utility within specific threshold probability ranges. Conclusion The multifactor nomogram exhibits strong predictive performance, facilitating early identification of high-risk patients and personalized treatment.

Frontiers in NeurologyVol. 17
Shenzhen Sixth People's Hospital (CN), Foshan Second People's Hospital (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.