Mechanisms shaping active‐break spell variability in flood and drought years of the Indian Summer Monsoon

Abstract This study investigates the contrasting characteristics of intraseasonal variability in flood and drought years during the Indian Summer Monsoon, focusing on active (wet) and break (dry) spells over Central India (21°–N, 72°–E). Using daily gridded rainfall data from the India Meteorological Department and ERA5 reanalysis (1979–2020), we show that flood years feature more frequent active spells (4.6 per season), whereas drought years exhibit longer and more frequent break spells (6–7 days, 3.9 per season). Lagged composites of mean sea‐level pressure (MSLP) reveal distinct evolution of intraseasonal anomalies: in flood years, positive MSLP anomalies propagate northwestward from the Bay of Bengal, while in drought years they stagnate over Central India. Multichannel singular spectrum analysis identifies dominant intraseasonal oscillations (ISOs): high‐frequency (10–20 day) northwestward‐propagating ISOs dominate in flood years, whereas low‐frequency (20–60 day) poleward‐drifting modes prevail in drought years. Composites of total column water indicate stronger midlatitude dry‐air intrusions that intensify break phases in drought years. To diagnose the underlying drivers, we decompose the seasonal moisture budget that isolates interannual variations in advective processes. Advection of mean moisture gradients by mean winds emerges as the leading term differentiating flood and drought years—positive in flood years and negative in drought years. Finally, ‐means clustering based on rainfall variance explained by ISO modes identifies four distinct regimes of intraseasonal variability. The regime with dominant low‐frequency intraseasonal oscillation (LF‐ISO) activity and suppressed high‐frequency intraseasonal oscillation (HF‐ISO) contributions corresponds to the lowest rainfall, whereas in contrast, the opposite regime strong HF‐ISO activity corresponds to excess rainfall. These results highlight how persistent contrasts in ISO activity, moisture advection, and midlatitude interactions shape the organization of active and break spells and provide new dynamical insights into the interplay of intraseasonal processes and interannual extremes in the South Asian monsoon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.70140
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanisms shaping active‐break spell variability in flood and drought years of the Indian Summer Monsoon

Ravi S. Nanjundiah, Ashwin K Seshadri, Ritesh Jha
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Climate variability and models
article

Mechanisms shaping active‐break spell variability in flood and drought years of the Indian Summer Monsoon

Ravi S. Nanjundiah, Ashwin K Seshadri, Ritesh Jha
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the contrasting characteristics of intraseasonal variability in flood and drought years during the Indian Summer Monsoon, focusing on active (wet) and break (dry) spells over Central India (21°–N, 72°–E). Using daily gridded rainfall data from the India Meteorological Department and ERA5 reanalysis (1979–2020), we show that flood years feature more frequent active spells (4.6 per season), whereas drought years exhibit longer and more frequent break spells (6–7 days, 3.9 per season). Lagged composites of mean sea‐level pressure (MSLP) reveal distinct evolution of intraseasonal anomalies: in flood years, positive MSLP anomalies propagate northwestward from the Bay of Bengal, while in drought years they stagnate over Central India. Multichannel singular spectrum analysis identifies dominant intraseasonal oscillations (ISOs): high‐frequency (10–20 day) northwestward‐propagating ISOs dominate in flood years, whereas low‐frequency (20–60 day) poleward‐drifting modes prevail in drought years. Composites of total column water indicate stronger midlatitude dry‐air intrusions that intensify break phases in drought years. To diagnose the underlying drivers, we decompose the seasonal moisture budget that isolates interannual variations in advective processes. Advection of mean moisture gradients by mean winds emerges as the leading term differentiating flood and drought years—positive in flood years and negative in drought years. Finally, ‐means clustering based on rainfall variance explained by ISO modes identifies four distinct regimes of intraseasonal variability. The regime with dominant low‐frequency intraseasonal oscillation (LF‐ISO) activity and suppressed high‐frequency intraseasonal oscillation (HF‐ISO) contributions corresponds to the lowest rainfall, whereas in contrast, the opposite regime strong HF‐ISO activity corresponds to excess rainfall. These results highlight how persistent contrasts in ISO activity, moisture advection, and midlatitude interactions shape the organization of active and break spells and provide new dynamical insights into the interplay of intraseasonal processes and interannual extremes in the South Asian monsoon.

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.