Nuances of information criteria for Bayesian psychometric models [Author Accepted Manuscript]

It is common practice to compare Bayesian psychometric models via information criteria such as DIC and WAIC. Especially because these criteria can be automatically computed by MCMC software, it is easy to ignore the intricacies related to their computation. This often leads researchers to use noisy criteria that may lead to suboptimal analysis decisions. In this paper, we first review different forms of Bayesian information criteria that could be computed for psychometric models. We then consider best practices, highlighting computational pitfalls that can occur even when one is attempting to follow best practices. Finally, we provide recommendations for the metrics’ practical uses. The paper is intended to clarify conflicting recommendations from the literature and to raise awareness about ways that information criteria can behave unexpectedly.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Archives
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21756
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nuances of information criteria for Bayesian psychometric models [Author Accepted Manuscript]

Edgar C. Merkle
Psychology Archives
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Nuances of information criteria for Bayesian psychometric models [Author Accepted Manuscript]

Edgar C. Merkle
article en

Abstract

It is common practice to compare Bayesian psychometric models via information criteria such as DIC and WAIC. Especially because these criteria can be automatically computed by MCMC software, it is easy to ignore the intricacies related to their computation. This often leads researchers to use noisy criteria that may lead to suboptimal analysis decisions. In this paper, we first review different forms of Bayesian information criteria that could be computed for psychometric models. We then consider best practices, highlighting computational pitfalls that can occur even when one is attempting to follow best practices. Finally, we provide recommendations for the metrics’ practical uses. The paper is intended to clarify conflicting recommendations from the literature and to raise awareness about ways that information criteria can behave unexpectedly.

Psychology Archives
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.