Psychometric evaluation of the flourishing-at-work scale in the Indonesian context

Job flourishing, integrating psychological, emotional, and social dimensions of well-being, represents a mental health state for workers and serves as a protective factor against mental problems at work. To capture this construct, the Flourishing at Work Scale - Short Form (FWS-SF; Rautenbach, 2015) has been widely used, but its applicability requires validation in diverse cultural settings. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of FWS-SF (FWS-SF IDN) across two complementary studies involving employees from multiple sectors. Study 1 evaluated the internal structure and reliability of the instrument, confirming a robust three-factor model and a second-order factor structure, with high internal consistency. Study 2 assessed construct validity, showing strong convergent validity with work engagement and discriminant validity with burnout. No gender bias was detected, and the findings highlighted the cultural salience of social well-being in the Indonesian context. Overall, the FWS-SF IDN demonstrated strong validity, reliability, and cultural sensitivity, supporting its use to assess flourishing in Indonesian workplaces. Theoretically, this study affirms job flourishing as a distinct and cross-culturally relevant construct. Practically, the instrument offers researchers and organizations a brief yet comprehensive tool to diagnose worker well-being and guide evidence-based interventions to foster healthier, more supportive work environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106606
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric evaluation of the flourishing-at-work scale in the Indonesian context

Lara Carminati, Ramadhan Dwi Marvianto, Jamilatu Istiyah, Diah N. Anggraini et al.
Acta Psychologica
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
article

Psychometric evaluation of the flourishing-at-work scale in the Indonesian context

Lara Carminati, Ramadhan Dwi Marvianto, Jamilatu Istiyah, Diah N. Anggraini, Ardian R. Afandi, Rizqi N. A'yuninnisa
article en

Abstract

Job flourishing, integrating psychological, emotional, and social dimensions of well-being, represents a mental health state for workers and serves as a protective factor against mental problems at work. To capture this construct, the Flourishing at Work Scale - Short Form (FWS-SF; Rautenbach, 2015) has been widely used, but its applicability requires validation in diverse cultural settings. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of FWS-SF (FWS-SF IDN) across two complementary studies involving employees from multiple sectors. Study 1 evaluated the internal structure and reliability of the instrument, confirming a robust three-factor model and a second-order factor structure, with high internal consistency. Study 2 assessed construct validity, showing strong convergent validity with work engagement and discriminant validity with burnout. No gender bias was detected, and the findings highlighted the cultural salience of social well-being in the Indonesian context. Overall, the FWS-SF IDN demonstrated strong validity, reliability, and cultural sensitivity, supporting its use to assess flourishing in Indonesian workplaces. Theoretically, this study affirms job flourishing as a distinct and cross-culturally relevant construct. Practically, the instrument offers researchers and organizations a brief yet comprehensive tool to diagnose worker well-being and guide evidence-based interventions to foster healthier, more supportive work environments.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 265
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), University of Twente (NL)
Reduced inequalities, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.