Team Boundary Blurring: Implications for the Next Decade of Teams Research

Team boundary blurring has become a defining feature of contemporary teamwork. Building on prior research, this essay conceptualizes boundary blurring along three trends: team fluidity (membership change), team overlap (multiple team membership), and geographic dispersion (through remote/distributed work). These trends are likely to intensify as employment becomes more flexible, project-based work expands, and hybrid work makes virtual collaboration common to a large portion of modern teams. This is critical because boundary blurring implies that team members differentially engage in and observe team interactions, increasing the likelihood that experiences and perceptions of team processes diverge rather than converge. This challenges the widespread reliance on compositional emergence assumptions and consensus-based aggregation in team research. The essay argues for stronger adoption of configural and process-oriented approaches to capture how team interaction structures emerge and evolve over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Group Research
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964261430374
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Team Boundary Blurring: Implications for the Next Decade of Teams Research

Lisa Handke
Small Group Research
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Team Boundary Blurring: Implications for the Next Decade of Teams Research

Lisa Handke
article en

Abstract

Team boundary blurring has become a defining feature of contemporary teamwork. Building on prior research, this essay conceptualizes boundary blurring along three trends: team fluidity (membership change), team overlap (multiple team membership), and geographic dispersion (through remote/distributed work). These trends are likely to intensify as employment becomes more flexible, project-based work expands, and hybrid work makes virtual collaboration common to a large portion of modern teams. This is critical because boundary blurring implies that team members differentially engage in and observe team interactions, increasing the likelihood that experiences and perceptions of team processes diverge rather than converge. This challenges the widespread reliance on compositional emergence assumptions and consensus-based aggregation in team research. The essay argues for stronger adoption of configural and process-oriented approaches to capture how team interaction structures emerge and evolve over time.

Small Group Research
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.