The Politics of Social Categorization: The Case of Transgender Women’s Athletic Participation in the United States

Political institutions often provide rights and protections for particular groups (e.g., refugees, groups that faced historical discrimination). Who belongs to a given group, however, can be contested. We study the politics of social categorization by focusing on transgender women’s athletic participation in the United States. We offer a framework that integrates work on frames, social construction, and group categorization. We predict a substantial change in attitudes about transgender women’s athletic participation between 2019 and 2024—a period during which the issue became highly politicized with the emergence of an exclusion frame. We use unique cross-sectional data from those years to show that support for transgender women’s participation substantially dropped. Strikingly, among Republicans, the relationship between support for a non-discrimination policy (Title IX) and support for transgender women’s sports participation flipped from positive to negative—thus, support for a non-discrimination policy correlated with exclusion beliefs in 2024. The findings highlight how existing non-discrimination policies can become mechanisms of category exclusion when the contested group is framed and then perceived as a threat to long-standing stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Research Quarterly
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129261433979
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of Social Categorization: The Case of Transgender Women’s Athletic Participation in the United States

James Druckman, Elizabeth A. Sharrow
Political Research Quarterly
Sports, Gender, and Society
article

The Politics of Social Categorization: The Case of Transgender Women’s Athletic Participation in the United States

James Druckman, Elizabeth A. Sharrow
article en

Abstract

Political institutions often provide rights and protections for particular groups (e.g., refugees, groups that faced historical discrimination). Who belongs to a given group, however, can be contested. We study the politics of social categorization by focusing on transgender women’s athletic participation in the United States. We offer a framework that integrates work on frames, social construction, and group categorization. We predict a substantial change in attitudes about transgender women’s athletic participation between 2019 and 2024—a period during which the issue became highly politicized with the emergence of an exclusion frame. We use unique cross-sectional data from those years to show that support for transgender women’s participation substantially dropped. Strikingly, among Republicans, the relationship between support for a non-discrimination policy (Title IX) and support for transgender women’s sports participation flipped from positive to negative—thus, support for a non-discrimination policy correlated with exclusion beliefs in 2024. The findings highlight how existing non-discrimination policies can become mechanisms of category exclusion when the contested group is framed and then perceived as a threat to long-standing stakeholders.

Political Research Quarterly
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), University of Rochester (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Sports, Gender, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.