Post-Carbon Victorian Studies: Energy, Literature, and the Archaeology of Fossil Power

Abstract: This guest editor's introduction examines the twin roots of Victorian studies and the energy humanities in post-1945 Anglo-America. It argues for a rapprochement between the two subfields by highlighting how Victorian studies has been structured and limited by the energy regimes it investigates. In the process, it introduces new hermeneutics for an energy-conscious criticism of the long nineteenth century—a "post-carbon Victorian studies"—and surveys some possible disciplinary futures in the wake of our overheated present. While defending the heuristic value of classifications such as "the coal era," "the steam era," and "fossil modernity," the introduction does not isolate the Victorian age as a bounded energy regime. Instead, it proposes that the energy humanities are vital to undisciplining Victorian studies more broadly, with attention to transimperial histories of race and globalization across the north–south hemispheric divide.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Victorian review
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/vcr.2025.a985002
Primary Topic
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-Carbon Victorian Studies: Energy, Literature, and the Archaeology of Fossil Power

Micheal Tondre
Victorian review
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
article

Post-Carbon Victorian Studies: Energy, Literature, and the Archaeology of Fossil Power

Micheal Tondre
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This guest editor's introduction examines the twin roots of Victorian studies and the energy humanities in post-1945 Anglo-America. It argues for a rapprochement between the two subfields by highlighting how Victorian studies has been structured and limited by the energy regimes it investigates. In the process, it introduces new hermeneutics for an energy-conscious criticism of the long nineteenth century—a "post-carbon Victorian studies"—and surveys some possible disciplinary futures in the wake of our overheated present. While defending the heuristic value of classifications such as "the coal era," "the steam era," and "fossil modernity," the introduction does not isolate the Victorian age as a bounded energy regime. Instead, it proposes that the energy humanities are vital to undisciplining Victorian studies more broadly, with attention to transimperial histories of race and globalization across the north–south hemispheric divide.

Victorian reviewVol. 51(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.