Exploring occupational therapists’ perspectives on the clinical utility of the Assessment of Client’s Enablement (ACE): A qualitative study

Introduction: The Assessment of Client’s Enablement (ACE) was developed to help occupational therapists address perceived differences with clients. However, its clinical utility in promoting collaboration has not been empirically studied. Method: This qualitative descriptive study involved semi-structured interviews with experienced occupational therapists who had used ACE in clinical practice. Transcribed data were analysed using the Steps for Coding and Theorization (SCAT) method. Results: Seven occupational therapists participated. ACE was perceived to facilitate mutual understanding and dialogue by making differences in perceptions of therapists and clients more visible. Three central themes were identified: (1) clinical characteristics and uses of ACE, including ease of integration into practice, provision of visual feedback and use as a complementary tool; (2) observed changes in both clients and therapists, including increased client insight, more active engagement and enhanced professional reflection; and (3) the promotion of collaborative processes, such as shared goal setting, improved communication and trust building. Participants emphasised the importance of appropriate timing and sensitivity to client characteristics to ensure ACE was used effectively and ethically. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary insight into how ACE may support collaboration in occupational therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226261423457
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring occupational therapists’ perspectives on the clinical utility of the Assessment of Client’s Enablement (ACE): A qualitative study

Manae Sato, Kanta Ohno, Tatsunori Sawada, Kounosuke Tomori et al.
British Journal of Occupational Therapy
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
article

Exploring occupational therapists’ perspectives on the clinical utility of the Assessment of Client’s Enablement (ACE): A qualitative study

Manae Sato, Kanta Ohno, Tatsunori Sawada, Kounosuke Tomori, Mikako Wakugawa
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The Assessment of Client’s Enablement (ACE) was developed to help occupational therapists address perceived differences with clients. However, its clinical utility in promoting collaboration has not been empirically studied. Method: This qualitative descriptive study involved semi-structured interviews with experienced occupational therapists who had used ACE in clinical practice. Transcribed data were analysed using the Steps for Coding and Theorization (SCAT) method. Results: Seven occupational therapists participated. ACE was perceived to facilitate mutual understanding and dialogue by making differences in perceptions of therapists and clients more visible. Three central themes were identified: (1) clinical characteristics and uses of ACE, including ease of integration into practice, provision of visual feedback and use as a complementary tool; (2) observed changes in both clients and therapists, including increased client insight, more active engagement and enhanced professional reflection; and (3) the promotion of collaborative processes, such as shared goal setting, improved communication and trust building. Participants emphasised the importance of appropriate timing and sensitivity to client characteristics to ensure ACE was used effectively and ethically. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary insight into how ACE may support collaboration in occupational therapy.

British Journal of Occupational Therapy
Tokyo University of Technology (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.