Experimental Investigation of Sensitivity for Coal and Gas Outburst Risk Prediction Indexes in Raw and Tectonic Composite Coal Seams

ABSTRACT The prediction of coal and gas outburst risk is a critical first step in preventing and controlling gas‐related accidents. To evaluate the sensitivity of outburst risk prediction indexes in raw and tectonic composite coal seams, both regional and local indexes for the No. 3 coal seam in the Daning Coal Mine were analyzed. Results indicate that tectonic coal exhibits higher initial gas desorption capacity and faster desorption rates than those of raw coal, resulting in a greater risk of coal and gas outbursts in tectonic coal seams. Among the regional outburst risk prediction indexes for the raw and tectonic composite coal seams, gas content was found to be more sensitive than gas pressure. A gas content of 8.00 m 3 /ton is identified as a safer critical threshold for the No. 3 coal seam. For local outburst risk prediction indexes, a comparison of gas desorption characteristics and index values under consistent laboratory‐determined pressure conditions reveals that the drilling cuttings gas desorption index K 1 exhibits lower determination error and higher sensitivity than Δ h 2 , enabling more accurate prediction of coal and gas outburst risk. Furthermore, a K 1 value of 0.46 mL/(g·min 0.5 ) is identified as a safer critical threshold for the No. 3 coal seam. These findings provide a crucial theoretical foundation for guiding the prevention and control of coal and gas outbursts and can inform process engineering design and coal mine safety practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Science & Engineering
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70505
Primary Topic
Coal Properties and Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Investigation of Sensitivity for Coal and Gas Outburst Risk Prediction Indexes in Raw and Tectonic Composite Coal Seams

Liang Wang, Y. Li, Haijun Guo, Xi Xi et al.
Energy Science & Engineering
Coal Properties and Utilization
article

Experimental Investigation of Sensitivity for Coal and Gas Outburst Risk Prediction Indexes in Raw and Tectonic Composite Coal Seams

Liang Wang, Y. Li, Haijun Guo, Xi Xi, Kai Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The prediction of coal and gas outburst risk is a critical first step in preventing and controlling gas‐related accidents. To evaluate the sensitivity of outburst risk prediction indexes in raw and tectonic composite coal seams, both regional and local indexes for the No. 3 coal seam in the Daning Coal Mine were analyzed. Results indicate that tectonic coal exhibits higher initial gas desorption capacity and faster desorption rates than those of raw coal, resulting in a greater risk of coal and gas outbursts in tectonic coal seams. Among the regional outburst risk prediction indexes for the raw and tectonic composite coal seams, gas content was found to be more sensitive than gas pressure. A gas content of 8.00 m 3 /ton is identified as a safer critical threshold for the No. 3 coal seam. For local outburst risk prediction indexes, a comparison of gas desorption characteristics and index values under consistent laboratory‐determined pressure conditions reveals that the drilling cuttings gas desorption index K 1 exhibits lower determination error and higher sensitivity than Δ h 2 , enabling more accurate prediction of coal and gas outburst risk. Furthermore, a K 1 value of 0.46 mL/(g·min 0.5 ) is identified as a safer critical threshold for the No. 3 coal seam. These findings provide a crucial theoretical foundation for guiding the prevention and control of coal and gas outbursts and can inform process engineering design and coal mine safety practices.

Energy Science & Engineering
China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital (CN), Zaozhuang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Coal Properties and Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.