Understanding Acceptance of Genome-Edited Crops and Foods: The Role of Trust, Attitudes, and Perceived Literacy in Italy

Genome-editing (GE) techniques are gaining relevance in the agri-food system for their potential to enhance crop resilience and sustainability, raising questions about consumer acceptance and responsible innovation. Understanding public willingness to buy (WTB) GE foods is therefore essential. While trust in science is often cited as a key driver, its effects are not straightforward. This study examines mechanisms linking trust in science to WTB GE foods, testing the mediating role of attitudes and the moderating role of perceived literacy. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with a representative sample of Italian adults. Using structural equation modelling, we tested three models: a mediation model, a model including a direct path between trust and WTB, and a moderated model incorporating perceived literacy. Trust predicted more favourable attitudes toward GE, and attitudes were strongly associated with WTB. However, when controlling for attitudes, the direct effect of trust on WTB was negative. Perceived literacy significantly moderated this relationship: higher perceived literacy strengthened the negative trust-WTB association. Overall, generalized trust in science is not sufficient for public acceptance of GE crops and foods. Communication strategies should move beyond trust-building and foster informed, critically engaged consumers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15061007
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Acceptance of Genome-Edited Crops and Foods: The Role of Trust, Attitudes, and Perceived Literacy in Italy

Marco Camardo Leggieri, Paolo Gomarasca, Michele Paleologo, Alessandra Lanubile et al.
Foods
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
article

Understanding Acceptance of Genome-Edited Crops and Foods: The Role of Trust, Attitudes, and Perceived Literacy in Italy

Marco Camardo Leggieri, Paolo Gomarasca, Michele Paleologo, Alessandra Lanubile, Guendalina Graffigna
article en

Abstract

Genome-editing (GE) techniques are gaining relevance in the agri-food system for their potential to enhance crop resilience and sustainability, raising questions about consumer acceptance and responsible innovation. Understanding public willingness to buy (WTB) GE foods is therefore essential. While trust in science is often cited as a key driver, its effects are not straightforward. This study examines mechanisms linking trust in science to WTB GE foods, testing the mediating role of attitudes and the moderating role of perceived literacy. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with a representative sample of Italian adults. Using structural equation modelling, we tested three models: a mediation model, a model including a direct path between trust and WTB, and a moderated model incorporating perceived literacy. Trust predicted more favourable attitudes toward GE, and attitudes were strongly associated with WTB. However, when controlling for attitudes, the direct effect of trust on WTB was negative. Perceived literacy significantly moderated this relationship: higher perceived literacy strengthened the negative trust-WTB association. Overall, generalized trust in science is not sufficient for public acceptance of GE crops and foods. Communication strategies should move beyond trust-building and foster informed, critically engaged consumers.

FoodsVol. 15(6)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of the Sacred Heart (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.