Impacts of new sex- and age-specific TSH and FT4 reference ranges on thyroid status and metabolic disorder associations

Abstract Context Thyroid hormone levels vary by age, sex, and genetic background; yet most clinical reference ranges (RRs) do not account for these factors, potentially leading to misclassification of thyroid status and missed associations with metabolic disorders. Objective To evaluate the impact of newly established age- and sex-specific reference ranges for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) on the prevalence of thyroid statuses and their associations with metabolic disorders. Methods Cross-sectional observational studies were conducted, and we enrolled over 8,000 participants who underwent thyroid status evaluation with Abbott and Siemens assay kits. We compared the prevalence of different thyroid statuses and corresponding metabolic disorders based on the new RRs with that based on the manufacturers’ RRs. Results New RRs significantly altered the prevalence of several thyroid statuses. Subclinical hypothyroidism increased in middle-aged individuals using Abbott kits but decreased in older individuals using Siemens kits. Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of TSH (SITSH, high FT4 with normal or elevated TSH) increased significantly with both kits when applying the new RRs. SITSH, defined by the new RRs, was significantly associated with increased risks of hypertension (Abbott: odds ratio [OR] 2.00; Siemens: OR 1.70) and diabetes (Abbott: OR 2.65; Siemens: OR 1.68), whereas no such associations were observed using the manufacturers’ RRs. Conclusions Age- and sex-specific RRs corrected the misclassification of thyroid status and uncovered a previously underdiagnosed group (SITSH) associated with cardiometabolic risks. These findings support the importance of new RRs for diagnostic accuracy and clinical risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvag053
Primary Topic
Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of new sex- and age-specific TSH and FT4 reference ranges on thyroid status and metabolic disorder associations

Koji Sakamaki, Sayaka Yamada, Masako Akuzawa, Kazuhiko Horiguchi et al.
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
article

Impacts of new sex- and age-specific TSH and FT4 reference ranges on thyroid status and metabolic disorder associations

Koji Sakamaki, Sayaka Yamada, Masako Akuzawa, Kazuhiko Horiguchi, Tetsuro Andou, M. Yamada, Eijiro Yamada
article en

Abstract

Abstract Context Thyroid hormone levels vary by age, sex, and genetic background; yet most clinical reference ranges (RRs) do not account for these factors, potentially leading to misclassification of thyroid status and missed associations with metabolic disorders. Objective To evaluate the impact of newly established age- and sex-specific reference ranges for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) on the prevalence of thyroid statuses and their associations with metabolic disorders. Methods Cross-sectional observational studies were conducted, and we enrolled over 8,000 participants who underwent thyroid status evaluation with Abbott and Siemens assay kits. We compared the prevalence of different thyroid statuses and corresponding metabolic disorders based on the new RRs with that based on the manufacturers’ RRs. Results New RRs significantly altered the prevalence of several thyroid statuses. Subclinical hypothyroidism increased in middle-aged individuals using Abbott kits but decreased in older individuals using Siemens kits. Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of TSH (SITSH, high FT4 with normal or elevated TSH) increased significantly with both kits when applying the new RRs. SITSH, defined by the new RRs, was significantly associated with increased risks of hypertension (Abbott: odds ratio [OR] 2.00; Siemens: OR 1.70) and diabetes (Abbott: OR 2.65; Siemens: OR 1.68), whereas no such associations were observed using the manufacturers’ RRs. Conclusions Age- and sex-specific RRs corrected the misclassification of thyroid status and uncovered a previously underdiagnosed group (SITSH) associated with cardiometabolic risks. These findings support the importance of new RRs for diagnostic accuracy and clinical risk stratification.

Journal of the Endocrine Society
Gunma University (JP), Noguchi Thyroid Clinic and Hospital Foundation (JP), Hidaka Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.