Emotional labor, well-being, and professional development among university teachers: a qualitative study from a job demands-resources perspective

This qualitative study explores how university teachers experience and manage emotional labor in relation to their professional well-being and development. Ten teachers from a public research-oriented university took part in semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, guided by the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, emotional labor theory, and research on teacher professional development and identity. Three main themes emerged. First, institutional emotional rules and hidden pressures included expectations to be “always positive” and “always available,” the emotional effects of evaluations and performance metrics, and blurred boundaries between work and personal life. Second, navigating emotional labor described how teachers moved between surface acting, deep acting, and selective authenticity, and how these strategies provided both protection and emotional costs over time. Third, emotional labor as professional learning showed how emotionally challenging experiences became turning points, how understandings of care and responsibility changed across career stages, and how peer support and mentoring supported more sustainable ways of working. Overall, the findings suggest that universities need multi-level responses that reduce structural pressures and create shared spaces where teachers can reflect on and discuss the emotional demands of academic work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1746170
Primary Topic
Emotional Labor in Professions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotional labor, well-being, and professional development among university teachers: a qualitative study from a job demands-resources perspective

Huaiyu Chang, Haoquan Sun, Xiaodong Shen
Frontiers in Psychology
Emotional Labor in Professions
article

Emotional labor, well-being, and professional development among university teachers: a qualitative study from a job demands-resources perspective

Huaiyu Chang, Haoquan Sun, Xiaodong Shen
article en

Abstract

This qualitative study explores how university teachers experience and manage emotional labor in relation to their professional well-being and development. Ten teachers from a public research-oriented university took part in semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, guided by the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, emotional labor theory, and research on teacher professional development and identity. Three main themes emerged. First, institutional emotional rules and hidden pressures included expectations to be “always positive” and “always available,” the emotional effects of evaluations and performance metrics, and blurred boundaries between work and personal life. Second, navigating emotional labor described how teachers moved between surface acting, deep acting, and selective authenticity, and how these strategies provided both protection and emotional costs over time. Third, emotional labor as professional learning showed how emotionally challenging experiences became turning points, how understandings of care and responsibility changed across career stages, and how peer support and mentoring supported more sustainable ways of working. Overall, the findings suggest that universities need multi-level responses that reduce structural pressures and create shared spaces where teachers can reflect on and discuss the emotional demands of academic work.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Northeast Normal University (CN), BaiCheng Normal University (CN)
People's Government of Jilin Province
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Emotional Labor in Professions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.