Development of Test and Item Analysis Competency Perception Measurement Tool: Validation and Reliability Study

This study aims to develop measurement tools (a scale and a checklist) that can measure teachers' perceptions of test and item analysis competence and to determine teachers' perceptions of competence in this area. A total of 1091 teachers working in public schools participated in this study, which is a survey model. In the scale development phase, 393 teachers’ data were used for EFA, 306 teachers’ data for CFA, and 92 teachers’ data for test-retest analysis. According to the findings, it was seen that the scale had a single-factor structure with 22 items. It was found that the one-dimensional structure of the scale was confirmed by examining the values of the fit indexes with confirmatory factor analysis. When the reliability coefficients were examined, it was seen that the Cronbach alpha value and test-retest analysis values were .968 and .975, respectively. In addition, it is stated that the scale is valid and reliable since it provides measurement invariance according to gender. The final form of the scale and the checklist developed by researchers about test and item analysis competency was applied to 300 teachers and an attempt was made to determine teachers' perceptions of test and item analysis competence. As a result, it was concluded that teachers had deficiencies in test and item statistics and that they were particularly inadequate in subjects requiring advanced statistics. Keywords: teacher competencies, test and item analysis, scale development

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1676585
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Test and Item Analysis Competency Perception Measurement Tool: Validation and Reliability Study

Müge Uluman, Münevver Başman, fatih kezer
Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Development of Test and Item Analysis Competency Perception Measurement Tool: Validation and Reliability Study

Müge Uluman, Münevver Başman, fatih kezer
article en

Abstract

This study aims to develop measurement tools (a scale and a checklist) that can measure teachers' perceptions of test and item analysis competence and to determine teachers' perceptions of competence in this area. A total of 1091 teachers working in public schools participated in this study, which is a survey model. In the scale development phase, 393 teachers’ data were used for EFA, 306 teachers’ data for CFA, and 92 teachers’ data for test-retest analysis. According to the findings, it was seen that the scale had a single-factor structure with 22 items. It was found that the one-dimensional structure of the scale was confirmed by examining the values of the fit indexes with confirmatory factor analysis. When the reliability coefficients were examined, it was seen that the Cronbach alpha value and test-retest analysis values were .968 and .975, respectively. In addition, it is stated that the scale is valid and reliable since it provides measurement invariance according to gender. The final form of the scale and the checklist developed by researchers about test and item analysis competency was applied to 300 teachers and an attempt was made to determine teachers' perceptions of test and item analysis competence. As a result, it was concluded that teachers had deficiencies in test and item statistics and that they were particularly inadequate in subjects requiring advanced statistics. Keywords: teacher competencies, test and item analysis, scale development

Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education(2)
Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR), Marmara University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.