Gold standard assessment of delirium severity in patients with dementia: Evaluation of an expert panel adjudication process

BackgroundPatients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) have an increased risk for delirium and subsequent complications. Rating delirium severity in the presence of co-occurring dementia is challenging due to overlapping features of delirium and ADRD. The multi-site prospective Better ASsessment of ILlness (BASIL)-II study will develop and validate a new delirium severity instrument for use in patients with and without ADRD.ObjectiveDescribe an expert panel process used to rate delirium severity.MethodsClinical assessors conducted standardized cognitive tests. A separate panel of experts independently reviewed assessors' reports, rated delirium severity using a 0-10 scale, and assigned dementia diagnoses using DSM-5 criteria. Panel agreement was defined using <i>a priori</i> criteria. Cases without agreement after initial review were discussed as a group and re-rated using a modified Delphi approach until achieving consensus.ResultsPatients (N = 488) were on average 79 years old, 58% female, and 75% White. After initial review, 80% of cases were in agreement for delirium severity. Kappa was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78, 0.82) before expert panel discussion and 0.90 (95%CI, 0.89, 0.92) after consensus. Final delirium severity ratings were no delirium (48%); subsyndromal (22%), mild-moderate (25%), or severe (6%). Disagreement in delirium severity was associated with ADRD (OR 3.02), nursing home setting (2.63), and vision impairment (2.42).ConclusionsThis rigorous process provides confidence that delirium severity can be rated accurately in patients with and without ADRD. We will use this expert panel adjudication to provide the reference standard for validation of a future delirium severity instrument.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261422418
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gold standard assessment of delirium severity in patients with dementia: Evaluation of an expert panel adjudication process

Tamara G. Fong, Douglas Tommet, Sharon K. Inouye, Mackenzie Topper et al.
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Gold standard assessment of delirium severity in patients with dementia: Evaluation of an expert panel adjudication process

Tamara G. Fong, Douglas Tommet, Sharon K. Inouye, Mackenzie Topper, Kenneth S. Boockvar, Edward R. Marcantonio, Cole Heine, Catherine C. Price, Eva M. Schmitt, for the BASIL-II Study Group, Eran D. Metzger, Richard N. Jones
article en

Abstract

BackgroundPatients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) have an increased risk for delirium and subsequent complications. Rating delirium severity in the presence of co-occurring dementia is challenging due to overlapping features of delirium and ADRD. The multi-site prospective Better ASsessment of ILlness (BASIL)-II study will develop and validate a new delirium severity instrument for use in patients with and without ADRD.ObjectiveDescribe an expert panel process used to rate delirium severity.MethodsClinical assessors conducted standardized cognitive tests. A separate panel of experts independently reviewed assessors' reports, rated delirium severity using a 0-10 scale, and assigned dementia diagnoses using DSM-5 criteria. Panel agreement was defined using <i>a priori</i> criteria. Cases without agreement after initial review were discussed as a group and re-rated using a modified Delphi approach until achieving consensus.ResultsPatients (N = 488) were on average 79 years old, 58% female, and 75% White. After initial review, 80% of cases were in agreement for delirium severity. Kappa was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78, 0.82) before expert panel discussion and 0.90 (95%CI, 0.89, 0.92) after consensus. Final delirium severity ratings were no delirium (48%); subsyndromal (22%), mild-moderate (25%), or severe (6%). Disagreement in delirium severity was associated with ADRD (OR 3.02), nursing home setting (2.63), and vision impairment (2.42).ConclusionsThis rigorous process provides confidence that delirium severity can be rated accurately in patients with and without ADRD. We will use this expert panel adjudication to provide the reference standard for validation of a future delirium severity instrument.

Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Brown University (US), Hadassah Medical Center (IL), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), University of Florida (US), Birmingham VA Medical Center (US), Hebrew SeniorLife (US), New Jewish Home (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.