Enablers of community‐led action in Australian climate disasters: recognising the role of pre‐existing social foundations and local knowledges

This study explores how disaster-impacted communities in New South Wales, Australia, mobilised during and after the bushfire crisis of 2019-20 and multiple catastrophic floods between 2020 and 2022. Interviews were conducted across three regions: Northern Rivers; Blue Mountains; and Hawkesbury. Our findings illuminate how community-led actions are driven by a broad range of 'local knowledges', based in and organised through long-standing networks and organisations. Supporting existing research, we illustrate why the 'spontaneous' label, which fuels negative perceptions of chaos and risk, remains inadequate for such organising. Furthermore, and crucially, we clarify the role and scope of 'local knowledges' and how they, and the networks in which they are embedded, refine an understanding of 'social infrastructure'. We argue that community knowledges and networks should be seen as essential for cross-sectoral disaster management and adaptation planning. Alongside the communities engaged, we advocate for their formal recognition and structural integration to reduce future disaster risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disasters
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.70048
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enablers of community‐led action in Australian climate disasters: recognising the role of pre‐existing social foundations and local knowledges

Margot Rawsthorne, David Schlosberg, Scott Webster, Danielle Celermajer et al.
Disasters
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Enablers of community‐led action in Australian climate disasters: recognising the role of pre‐existing social foundations and local knowledges

Margot Rawsthorne, David Schlosberg, Scott Webster, Danielle Celermajer, Pam Joseph, Petr Matouš, Jakelin Troy, Nader Naderpajouh, Blanche Verlie, Jo Longman, Jodie Bailie, A D P Howard, Kurt Iveson, Gemma Viney, Emma Pittaway, Zachary Gillies‐Palmer
article en

Abstract

This study explores how disaster-impacted communities in New South Wales, Australia, mobilised during and after the bushfire crisis of 2019-20 and multiple catastrophic floods between 2020 and 2022. Interviews were conducted across three regions: Northern Rivers; Blue Mountains; and Hawkesbury. Our findings illuminate how community-led actions are driven by a broad range of 'local knowledges', based in and organised through long-standing networks and organisations. Supporting existing research, we illustrate why the 'spontaneous' label, which fuels negative perceptions of chaos and risk, remains inadequate for such organising. Furthermore, and crucially, we clarify the role and scope of 'local knowledges' and how they, and the networks in which they are embedded, refine an understanding of 'social infrastructure'. We argue that community knowledges and networks should be seen as essential for cross-sectoral disaster management and adaptation planning. Alongside the communities engaged, we advocate for their formal recognition and structural integration to reduce future disaster risk.

DisastersVol. 50(2)
The University of Sydney (AU)
Australian Government, New South Wales Government
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.