Comparing granular and fragmentation-driven silo DEM models for block caving

Silo analogies are commonly used in block caving research to study gravity-driven flow and stress redistribution. However, most existing models rely on idealized granular assemblies composed of random granular packings, which might differ from fragmented rock masses. The aim of this numerical study is to investigate the influence of material characteristics on flow dynamics and internal stresses in a silo. Using the Discrete Element Method (DEM), we compare three silo models: (i) a caving-like (CL) configuration, generated by progressively de-bonding a tessellated solid column during draw, thus emulating rock fragmentation; (ii) a caving-polygons (CP) configuration, in which the same fragments are deposited randomly into the silo; and (iii) a caving-disks (CD) configuration, representing a traditional granular silo composed of circular particles; all three models share the same particle size distribution. These configurations enable comparing the effects of granular packing, particle shape, interlocking, and fragmentation mechanisms on discharge behavior. Results show that flow velocities, displacement fields, and internal pressure distributions differ markedly between traditional granular silos and fragmentation-driven systems. The CD configuration develops the highest pressures surrounding the outlet, whereas the CL configuration redistributes stresses more efficiently, with forces preferentially supported by the silo walls; the CP system exhibits intermediate behavior. The findings highlight key limitations of conventional silo analogues and underscore the need for more representative material descriptions in block caving simulations. This work provides a basis for selecting appropriate DEM modeling strategies, with perspectives of improving DEM cave-flow predictions. • Granular discharge obeys Beverloo scaling regardless of particle shape and packing density. • Particle interlocking strongly reduces flow rate and caveability. • Stress redistribution differs fundamentally between disks and fragmented blocks. • Fragmentation-driven packings sustain quasi-static cave-shaped flow zones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Powder Technology
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2026.122409
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing granular and fragmentation-driven silo DEM models for block caving

Manuel Cárdenas-Barrantes, Carlos Ovalle, Mathieu Renouf, Emilien Azéma
Powder Technology
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Comparing granular and fragmentation-driven silo DEM models for block caving

Manuel Cárdenas-Barrantes, Carlos Ovalle, Mathieu Renouf, Emilien Azéma
article en

Abstract

Silo analogies are commonly used in block caving research to study gravity-driven flow and stress redistribution. However, most existing models rely on idealized granular assemblies composed of random granular packings, which might differ from fragmented rock masses. The aim of this numerical study is to investigate the influence of material characteristics on flow dynamics and internal stresses in a silo. Using the Discrete Element Method (DEM), we compare three silo models: (i) a caving-like (CL) configuration, generated by progressively de-bonding a tessellated solid column during draw, thus emulating rock fragmentation; (ii) a caving-polygons (CP) configuration, in which the same fragments are deposited randomly into the silo; and (iii) a caving-disks (CD) configuration, representing a traditional granular silo composed of circular particles; all three models share the same particle size distribution. These configurations enable comparing the effects of granular packing, particle shape, interlocking, and fragmentation mechanisms on discharge behavior. Results show that flow velocities, displacement fields, and internal pressure distributions differ markedly between traditional granular silos and fragmentation-driven systems. The CD configuration develops the highest pressures surrounding the outlet, whereas the CL configuration redistributes stresses more efficiently, with forces preferentially supported by the silo walls; the CP system exhibits intermediate behavior. The findings highlight key limitations of conventional silo analogues and underscore the need for more representative material descriptions in block caving simulations. This work provides a basis for selecting appropriate DEM modeling strategies, with perspectives of improving DEM cave-flow predictions. • Granular discharge obeys Beverloo scaling regardless of particle shape and packing density. • Particle interlocking strongly reduces flow rate and caveability. • Stress redistribution differs fundamentally between disks and fragmented blocks. • Fragmentation-driven packings sustain quasi-static cave-shaped flow zones.

Powder TechnologyVol. 476
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (CA), Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (CA), Université de Montpellier (FR), Laboratoire de Mécanique et Génie Civil (FR), Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.