Generative AI technologies and educational outcomes: a comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and AI-driven approaches

With the exponentially rapid development of information technologies, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies have been widely applied to various fields, including education. However, few studies have synthesized the pooled effect of GenAI on educational outcomes, which is an important research gap this study aims to address. Through the PRISMA-based meta-analysis and systematic review, this study concludes a central finding: GenAI technologies may generally outperform traditional and non-GenAI educational approaches in the improvement of educational outcomes, especially strengthening academic achievements, higher-order thinking abilities, and writing skills more effectively than non-GenAI-assisted approaches, with GenAI feedback yielding superior results as well. Although subgroup analyses regarding countries and different interventions have identified nuanced findings, the core value of the current study lies in the evidence-based, unified assessment of GenAI’s role in education, which possibly enables stakeholders to optimize AI-integrated educational strategies, effectively guides researchers to prioritize meaningful areas for further exploration, and efficiently equips policymakers to make informed decisions in educational practice. Future researchers should delve into the impact of GenAI technologies on students with disabilities and design personalized teaching strategies tailored to their needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06903-y
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI technologies and educational outcomes: a comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and AI-driven approaches

Ying Dong
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Generative AI technologies and educational outcomes: a comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and AI-driven approaches

Ying Dong
article en

Abstract

With the exponentially rapid development of information technologies, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies have been widely applied to various fields, including education. However, few studies have synthesized the pooled effect of GenAI on educational outcomes, which is an important research gap this study aims to address. Through the PRISMA-based meta-analysis and systematic review, this study concludes a central finding: GenAI technologies may generally outperform traditional and non-GenAI educational approaches in the improvement of educational outcomes, especially strengthening academic achievements, higher-order thinking abilities, and writing skills more effectively than non-GenAI-assisted approaches, with GenAI feedback yielding superior results as well. Although subgroup analyses regarding countries and different interventions have identified nuanced findings, the core value of the current study lies in the evidence-based, unified assessment of GenAI’s role in education, which possibly enables stakeholders to optimize AI-integrated educational strategies, effectively guides researchers to prioritize meaningful areas for further exploration, and efficiently equips policymakers to make informed decisions in educational practice. Future researchers should delve into the impact of GenAI technologies on students with disabilities and design personalized teaching strategies tailored to their needs.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.