Optimal indoor cooling in hot climates: Experimental and computational insights on human thermal comfort

Rapid transitions between hot outdoor environments and cold air-conditioned spaces are common in tropical cities, yet their physiological effects remain insufficiently quantified. As a result, indoor temperature setpoints are often selected based on steady-state comfort indices, which may overlook transient cold stress, cardiovascular strain during rewarming, and the risk of prolonged discomfort during everyday outdoor–indoor transitions. This study combines controlled human trials with finite-element bioheat simulations to investigate skin and internal temperature responses under realistic thermal shifts. Thirty participants (20 male, 10 female; ages 15–60; varied BMI and activity levels) were exposed to five indoor cooling scenarios (18.7–25.9 °C) after 30 min of outdoor heat exposure (36.5–39.0 °C) in Sylhet, Bangladesh. Skin temperature and subjective discomfort were recorded during 30 min of cooling and up to 120 min of rewarming. A 3D anatomical thermoregulatory model based on Pennes' bioheat equation, developed in COMSOL (1.88 M elements), reproduced transient skin, muscle, and core temperatures. Across all cases, 26.8 °C emerged as the consistent skin-temperature threshold for cold discomfort. Environments below 21 °C induced rapid cooling discomfort within 7–14 min in the coldest case, triggering vasoconstriction, increased metabolic load, and mild hypothermia risk. Moderate settings (21–26 °C) maintained skin and muscle temperatures above critical thresholds, reducing thermoregulatory strain and enabling prolonged comfort. Age, BMI, and habitual activity influenced cooling rates, with younger and more active individuals tolerating longer exposures. Re -exposure to outdoor heat caused rapid skin warming (0.45–0.684 °C/min in the first 15 min), potentially stressing the cardiovascular system. These findings support 21–26 °C as the optimal range for air-conditioned environments in hot climates, balancing comfort, health, and energy efficiency. The integrated experimental–computational approach offers a validated framework for HVAC design, occupational health policy, and climate-adaptive building strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2026.111019
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal indoor cooling in hot climates: Experimental and computational insights on human thermal comfort

Suvash C. Saha, Mohammad Junaid, Abul Mukid Md. Mukaddes
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Optimal indoor cooling in hot climates: Experimental and computational insights on human thermal comfort

Suvash C. Saha, Mohammad Junaid, Abul Mukid Md. Mukaddes
article en

Abstract

Rapid transitions between hot outdoor environments and cold air-conditioned spaces are common in tropical cities, yet their physiological effects remain insufficiently quantified. As a result, indoor temperature setpoints are often selected based on steady-state comfort indices, which may overlook transient cold stress, cardiovascular strain during rewarming, and the risk of prolonged discomfort during everyday outdoor–indoor transitions. This study combines controlled human trials with finite-element bioheat simulations to investigate skin and internal temperature responses under realistic thermal shifts. Thirty participants (20 male, 10 female; ages 15–60; varied BMI and activity levels) were exposed to five indoor cooling scenarios (18.7–25.9 °C) after 30 min of outdoor heat exposure (36.5–39.0 °C) in Sylhet, Bangladesh. Skin temperature and subjective discomfort were recorded during 30 min of cooling and up to 120 min of rewarming. A 3D anatomical thermoregulatory model based on Pennes' bioheat equation, developed in COMSOL (1.88 M elements), reproduced transient skin, muscle, and core temperatures. Across all cases, 26.8 °C emerged as the consistent skin-temperature threshold for cold discomfort. Environments below 21 °C induced rapid cooling discomfort within 7–14 min in the coldest case, triggering vasoconstriction, increased metabolic load, and mild hypothermia risk. Moderate settings (21–26 °C) maintained skin and muscle temperatures above critical thresholds, reducing thermoregulatory strain and enabling prolonged comfort. Age, BMI, and habitual activity influenced cooling rates, with younger and more active individuals tolerating longer exposures. Re -exposure to outdoor heat caused rapid skin warming (0.45–0.684 °C/min in the first 15 min), potentially stressing the cardiovascular system. These findings support 21–26 °C as the optimal range for air-conditioned environments in hot climates, balancing comfort, health, and energy efficiency. The integrated experimental–computational approach offers a validated framework for HVAC design, occupational health policy, and climate-adaptive building strategies.

International Communications in Heat and Mass TransferVol. 175
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (BD)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.