Is it drinking poison to quench thirst? Learners’ risk awareness and continuance intention to use GAI in L2 writing

While numerous studies have emphasized the risks and challenges in integrating AI into higher education, relatively few studies have considered students’ awareness of such risks. What is even more lacking is empirical evidence of students’ awareness of the risks specifically related to their learning. This article reports a mixed-method study to survey the level of risk awareness among a sample of 977 Chinese tertiary learners, assessed the relationship between risk awareness and the intention to continue using AI, and uncover the factors that propel their continuance intention. The article first reported the creation and validation of a two-factor questionnaire of risk awareness: risk of overreliance (RO) and risk of losing teacher feedback (RLTF). Structural equation modelling showed that RO negatively predicted attitude toward AI but positively predicted continuance intention. RLTF positively predicted attitude toward AI but did not significantly predict continuance intention. Interviews suggest that students may deliberately ignore the potential risks in pursuit of course grades and in face of heavy academic work. They believed that the risks were under their control. Implications for AI integration are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04330-x
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is it drinking poison to quench thirst? Learners’ risk awareness and continuance intention to use GAI in L2 writing

Elanttamil Maruthai, Beibei Kong
BMC Psychology
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
article

Is it drinking poison to quench thirst? Learners’ risk awareness and continuance intention to use GAI in L2 writing

Elanttamil Maruthai, Beibei Kong
article en

Abstract

While numerous studies have emphasized the risks and challenges in integrating AI into higher education, relatively few studies have considered students’ awareness of such risks. What is even more lacking is empirical evidence of students’ awareness of the risks specifically related to their learning. This article reports a mixed-method study to survey the level of risk awareness among a sample of 977 Chinese tertiary learners, assessed the relationship between risk awareness and the intention to continue using AI, and uncover the factors that propel their continuance intention. The article first reported the creation and validation of a two-factor questionnaire of risk awareness: risk of overreliance (RO) and risk of losing teacher feedback (RLTF). Structural equation modelling showed that RO negatively predicted attitude toward AI but positively predicted continuance intention. RLTF positively predicted attitude toward AI but did not significantly predict continuance intention. Interviews suggest that students may deliberately ignore the potential risks in pursuit of course grades and in face of heavy academic work. They believed that the risks were under their control. Implications for AI integration are discussed.

BMC Psychology
China University of Mining and Technology (CN), University of Malaya (MY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.