Pro-European Euroscepticism? The particular case of Serbia’s opposition parties

This article examines the emergence of a novel trend of pro-European Euroscepticism in Serbia, concentrating on its articulation within pro-EU opposition parties. Historically supportive of European Union (EU) accession, these parties have begun to voice substantial criticism of EU policies and practices. This shift in stance is particularly notable in the context of EU accession negotiations stagnating and the EU's perceived lack of engagement in Serbia's democratisation, which has resulted in the strengthening of stabilitocracy. Using qualitative methods, the study asks whether Eurosceptic rhetoric has entered the domain of traditionally pro-EU parties and, if so, what the principal arguments are. Employing the typology of Euroscepticism developed by Kopecký and Mudde, the article categorises party stances as Euroenthusiasts, Eurosceptics, Europragmatists, and Eurorejects. The article focuses on pro-EU opposition parties that adopt Eurosceptic rhetoric, experimenting with the term ‘pro-European Euroscepticism’. Parties that support the EU seek cooperation to address national challenges, including corruption and environmental issues, but express disappointment with the EU's reluctance to defend its stated values – such as the rule of law, political plurality and environmental protection. The study highlights how EU policy inefficiencies and stabilitocracy fuel Euroscepticism in Serbia, emphasising the nuanced perspectives of pro-EU opposition parties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2026.2636829
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pro-European Euroscepticism? The particular case of Serbia’s opposition parties

Natasza Styczyńska
Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Pro-European Euroscepticism? The particular case of Serbia’s opposition parties

Natasza Styczyńska
article en

Abstract

This article examines the emergence of a novel trend of pro-European Euroscepticism in Serbia, concentrating on its articulation within pro-EU opposition parties. Historically supportive of European Union (EU) accession, these parties have begun to voice substantial criticism of EU policies and practices. This shift in stance is particularly notable in the context of EU accession negotiations stagnating and the EU's perceived lack of engagement in Serbia's democratisation, which has resulted in the strengthening of stabilitocracy. Using qualitative methods, the study asks whether Eurosceptic rhetoric has entered the domain of traditionally pro-EU parties and, if so, what the principal arguments are. Employing the typology of Euroscepticism developed by Kopecký and Mudde, the article categorises party stances as Euroenthusiasts, Eurosceptics, Europragmatists, and Eurorejects. The article focuses on pro-EU opposition parties that adopt Eurosceptic rhetoric, experimenting with the term ‘pro-European Euroscepticism’. Parties that support the EU seek cooperation to address national challenges, including corruption and environmental issues, but express disappointment with the EU's reluctance to defend its stated values – such as the rule of law, political plurality and environmental protection. The study highlights how EU policy inefficiencies and stabilitocracy fuel Euroscepticism in Serbia, emphasising the nuanced perspectives of pro-EU opposition parties.

Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.