Linking cyberbullying sensitivity to life satisfaction: The mediating role of digital well-being

Digital technologies expose individuals to online environments in which perceived risks of cyberbullying may heighten individuals’ sensitivity to potential harm, thereby influencing psychological well-being. However, the mechanisms through which cyberbullying sensitivity affects life satisfaction remain unclear. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, this study examined whether digital well-being mediates the relationship between cyberbullying sensitivity and life satisfaction in a convenience sample of individuals aged 15–39 in Turkey. A total of 513 individuals (Mage = 22.08, SD = 4.60; range = 15–39; 77.8% female) in Turkey completed validated self-report measures assessing cyberbullying sensitivity, digital well-being, and life satisfaction. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling with bootstrap procedures (5,000 resamples). Common method bias was assessed using Harman's single-factor test. Cyberbullying sensitivity significantly predicted digital well-being (β = .534, p < .001), explaining 28.5% of its variance. Digital well-being demonstrated a significant indirect effect in the association between cyberbullying sensitivity and life satisfaction (β = .201, 90% CI [.119, .304], p < .001). The direct path from cyberbullying sensitivity to life satisfaction was not significant (β = .113, p = .137), indicating that the association was primarily explained through digital well-being. Harman's single-factor test indicated that common method bias was not a concern (26.69% variance). Digital well-being represents the primary mechanism through which cyberbullying sensitivity is indirectly associated with life satisfaction. Rather than exerting direct effects, online risk perceptions operate through individuals' capacity to maintain psychological balance and self-regulation in digital environments. These findings suggest that interventions should prioritize enhancing digital well-being—through digital literacy, self-regulation skills, and positive online experiences—as a protective factor against the negative consequences of cyberbullying sensitivity. This study advances theoretical understanding by integrating Self-Determination Theory with digital well-being research and provides evidence-based guidance for educators, mental health professionals, and technology designers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04338-3
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linking cyberbullying sensitivity to life satisfaction: The mediating role of digital well-being

İsmail Kuşci, Vedat Bakır
BMC Psychology
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

Linking cyberbullying sensitivity to life satisfaction: The mediating role of digital well-being

İsmail Kuşci, Vedat Bakır
article en

Abstract

Digital technologies expose individuals to online environments in which perceived risks of cyberbullying may heighten individuals’ sensitivity to potential harm, thereby influencing psychological well-being. However, the mechanisms through which cyberbullying sensitivity affects life satisfaction remain unclear. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, this study examined whether digital well-being mediates the relationship between cyberbullying sensitivity and life satisfaction in a convenience sample of individuals aged 15–39 in Turkey. A total of 513 individuals (Mage = 22.08, SD = 4.60; range = 15–39; 77.8% female) in Turkey completed validated self-report measures assessing cyberbullying sensitivity, digital well-being, and life satisfaction. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling with bootstrap procedures (5,000 resamples). Common method bias was assessed using Harman's single-factor test. Cyberbullying sensitivity significantly predicted digital well-being (β = .534, p < .001), explaining 28.5% of its variance. Digital well-being demonstrated a significant indirect effect in the association between cyberbullying sensitivity and life satisfaction (β = .201, 90% CI [.119, .304], p < .001). The direct path from cyberbullying sensitivity to life satisfaction was not significant (β = .113, p = .137), indicating that the association was primarily explained through digital well-being. Harman's single-factor test indicated that common method bias was not a concern (26.69% variance). Digital well-being represents the primary mechanism through which cyberbullying sensitivity is indirectly associated with life satisfaction. Rather than exerting direct effects, online risk perceptions operate through individuals' capacity to maintain psychological balance and self-regulation in digital environments. These findings suggest that interventions should prioritize enhancing digital well-being—through digital literacy, self-regulation skills, and positive online experiences—as a protective factor against the negative consequences of cyberbullying sensitivity. This study advances theoretical understanding by integrating Self-Determination Theory with digital well-being research and provides evidence-based guidance for educators, mental health professionals, and technology designers.

BMC Psychology
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR), Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.