Using multiple Q-Q plots to measure comparative change from pseudo-cohort studies

Abstract Although International Large-scale Assessment Surveys (ILSA) produce a wealth of policy-relevant information, as cross-sectional surveys they don’t yield measures of change for specific cohorts. This severely limits not only their ability to describe cohort learning over time, but also their utility in generating evidence relevant to causal inferences regarding policy or program efficacy. In this article, we describe a new methodology that, by employing multiple Q-Q plots in the context of pseudo-cohort designs, enables the estimation of comparative change. Such comparisons can be made between subpopulations within a country, among different countries, or for specific subpopulations across countries. These Q-Q plot-based descriptions of comparative change complement the performance level statistics currently available. The methodology, termed the ‘Multiple Q-Q Plot’, inherits the advantages of Q-Q plots and generates graphics that are easy to interpret. The plots are intended to be used as an exploratory tool to identify differences and/or similarities of interest to education stakeholders and education researchers, to stimulate further investigations and, in some settings, contribute to causal analysis. The article includes a brief tutorial on the methodology. Further, using data from Trends in International Math and Science Study (TIMSS), it presents a number of illustrative examples, concluding with a discussion of methodological issues, as well as some implications for education policy research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Large-scale Assessments in Education
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-026-00291-0
Primary Topic
Q Methodology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using multiple Q-Q plots to measure comparative change from pseudo-cohort studies

Henry Braun
Large-scale Assessments in Education
Q Methodology Applications
article

Using multiple Q-Q plots to measure comparative change from pseudo-cohort studies

Henry Braun
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although International Large-scale Assessment Surveys (ILSA) produce a wealth of policy-relevant information, as cross-sectional surveys they don’t yield measures of change for specific cohorts. This severely limits not only their ability to describe cohort learning over time, but also their utility in generating evidence relevant to causal inferences regarding policy or program efficacy. In this article, we describe a new methodology that, by employing multiple Q-Q plots in the context of pseudo-cohort designs, enables the estimation of comparative change. Such comparisons can be made between subpopulations within a country, among different countries, or for specific subpopulations across countries. These Q-Q plot-based descriptions of comparative change complement the performance level statistics currently available. The methodology, termed the ‘Multiple Q-Q Plot’, inherits the advantages of Q-Q plots and generates graphics that are easy to interpret. The plots are intended to be used as an exploratory tool to identify differences and/or similarities of interest to education stakeholders and education researchers, to stimulate further investigations and, in some settings, contribute to causal analysis. The article includes a brief tutorial on the methodology. Further, using data from Trends in International Math and Science Study (TIMSS), it presents a number of illustrative examples, concluding with a discussion of methodological issues, as well as some implications for education policy research.

Large-scale Assessments in EducationVol. 14(1)
Boston College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Q Methodology Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.