Reducing relapses after acute malnutrition treatment: evidence from a simplified approach in emergency settings of Mali

Background Acute malnutrition remains a critical public health issue, particularly in emergency settings. While simplified treatment protocols show promise in improving access and cost-effectiveness, evidence on their impact on relapse rates remains limited. This study aimed to compare relapse incidence among children treated for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) using a simplified protocol versus the standard Community Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) protocol in the emergency context of Gao, Mali. Methods This is a non-randomized controlled trial conducted between December 2022 and December 2023, involving 506 children aged 6–59 months discharged as cured from SAM. The intervention group ( n = 270) received treatment via a simplified protocol using Mid-upper arm circumference, (MUAC)-only criteria and fixed ready-to-use therapeutic (RUTF) dose, while the standard protocol group ( n = 236) followed the standard CMAM protocol. Children were followed for up to eight months post-discharge. Relapse was defined as meeting anthropometric criteria for acute malnutrition during follow-up. Cox regression models were used to identify risk factors. Results Relapse incidence was significantly lower in the simplified protocol group (5.6%) compared to the standard one (39.8%). The simplified protocol also had longer length of stay, used lower quantity of RUTF, and fewer comorbidities at discharge. We found similar results when analyzing the sub-sample with those children admitted with MUAC-only in the control group. Multivariate analysis identified treatment with the simplified protocol, older age at discharge, and greater MUAC gain as protective factors. Comorbidities during follow-up were the strongest predictor of relapse. Conclusion Simplified protocols may reduce relapse rates after SAM treatment, even with reduced RUTF doses. Strengthening discharge procedures and post-discharge monitoring, particularly in emergency settings, is essential to sustain recovery and prevent relapse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1773585
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing relapses after acute malnutrition treatment: evidence from a simplified approach in emergency settings of Mali

Sara Tulipani, Mahamadou N’tji Samake, A. Briend, Amadou Tila Kebe et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Child Nutrition and Water Access
article

Reducing relapses after acute malnutrition treatment: evidence from a simplified approach in emergency settings of Mali

Sara Tulipani, Mahamadou N’tji Samake, A. Briend, Amadou Tila Kebe, Mohamed Ibrahim Mahmoud, Noemí López-Ejeda, Antonio Vargas, Pilar Charle-Cuéllar, Luis Javier Sánchez-Martínez, Abdel Nasser Maïga, Mamadou Saidou Diallo, Fatimata Karabenta
article en

Abstract

Background Acute malnutrition remains a critical public health issue, particularly in emergency settings. While simplified treatment protocols show promise in improving access and cost-effectiveness, evidence on their impact on relapse rates remains limited. This study aimed to compare relapse incidence among children treated for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) using a simplified protocol versus the standard Community Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) protocol in the emergency context of Gao, Mali. Methods This is a non-randomized controlled trial conducted between December 2022 and December 2023, involving 506 children aged 6–59 months discharged as cured from SAM. The intervention group ( n = 270) received treatment via a simplified protocol using Mid-upper arm circumference, (MUAC)-only criteria and fixed ready-to-use therapeutic (RUTF) dose, while the standard protocol group ( n = 236) followed the standard CMAM protocol. Children were followed for up to eight months post-discharge. Relapse was defined as meeting anthropometric criteria for acute malnutrition during follow-up. Cox regression models were used to identify risk factors. Results Relapse incidence was significantly lower in the simplified protocol group (5.6%) compared to the standard one (39.8%). The simplified protocol also had longer length of stay, used lower quantity of RUTF, and fewer comorbidities at discharge. We found similar results when analyzing the sub-sample with those children admitted with MUAC-only in the control group. Multivariate analysis identified treatment with the simplified protocol, older age at discharge, and greater MUAC gain as protective factors. Comorbidities during follow-up were the strongest predictor of relapse. Conclusion Simplified protocols may reduce relapse rates after SAM treatment, even with reduced RUTF doses. Strengthening discharge procedures and post-discharge monitoring, particularly in emergency settings, is essential to sustain recovery and prevent relapse.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), University of Copenhagen (DK), Innovation Cluster (Canada) (CA), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Tampere University (FI), Action Contre la Faim (FR)
Action Contre La Faim
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.