Seismic Response and Predictive Modeling of Large-Diameter Shield Tunnels with Voids Behind Lining

Voids behind the lining that develop during long-term operation can seriously compromise the seismic safety performance of metro shield tunnels. To investigate the influence of such void defects on large-diameter shield tunnels, this study systematically analyzed the causes and distribution patterns of voids. A three-dimensional discontinuous finite element model was developed to simulate the interaction among lining segments, connecting bolts, and surrounding rock. The seismic responses, including circumferential stress, interface slip, interface opening, and bolt tensile stress, were analyzed considering coupled factors such as the void circumferential angle, radial depth, distribution location, and geological conditions. Single-factor and multi-factor sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the significance of the above coupled factors on the overall seismic response. The results show that lining circumferential stress, displacement, interface opening, and bolt stress increase with void enlargement, a shift in void location from the crown to the haunch, and deterioration of geological conditions. A void located at the right haunch leads to a peak circumferential stress of 3.27 MPa, causing local segment damage. Sensitivity analysis reveals that void location is the most influential factor affecting the seismic response, while geological conditions exhibit lower sensitivity. A predictive model for the peak circumferential stress around the void was established using multiple linear regression, incorporating void position, circumferential angle, and radial depth. Within the parameter range considered in this study, this model provides a theoretical basis and practical reference for rapid seismic risk assessment and safety management of shield tunnels with void defects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061110
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic Response and Predictive Modeling of Large-Diameter Shield Tunnels with Voids Behind Lining

Ju Li, Hui Li, Shunbo Zhao, XiaoKe Li et al.
Buildings
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Seismic Response and Predictive Modeling of Large-Diameter Shield Tunnels with Voids Behind Lining

Ju Li, Hui Li, Shunbo Zhao, XiaoKe Li, Zhen Chen, Hui Wang
article en

Abstract

Voids behind the lining that develop during long-term operation can seriously compromise the seismic safety performance of metro shield tunnels. To investigate the influence of such void defects on large-diameter shield tunnels, this study systematically analyzed the causes and distribution patterns of voids. A three-dimensional discontinuous finite element model was developed to simulate the interaction among lining segments, connecting bolts, and surrounding rock. The seismic responses, including circumferential stress, interface slip, interface opening, and bolt tensile stress, were analyzed considering coupled factors such as the void circumferential angle, radial depth, distribution location, and geological conditions. Single-factor and multi-factor sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the significance of the above coupled factors on the overall seismic response. The results show that lining circumferential stress, displacement, interface opening, and bolt stress increase with void enlargement, a shift in void location from the crown to the haunch, and deterioration of geological conditions. A void located at the right haunch leads to a peak circumferential stress of 3.27 MPa, causing local segment damage. Sensitivity analysis reveals that void location is the most influential factor affecting the seismic response, while geological conditions exhibit lower sensitivity. A predictive model for the peak circumferential stress around the void was established using multiple linear regression, incorporating void position, circumferential angle, and radial depth. Within the parameter range considered in this study, this model provides a theoretical basis and practical reference for rapid seismic risk assessment and safety management of shield tunnels with void defects.

BuildingsVol. 16(6)
North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN), Henan Institute of Technology (CN), Henan Forestry Vocational College (CN)
Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.