Colorimetric Behaviour of Ceramic Zirconia Restorations Cemented on Darkened Substrates—In Vitro Study

The colour matching of ceramic restorations is sensitive to ceramic thickness, ceramic optical properties, the tooth region, the tooth/substrate basis colour, and the shade of the bonding agent. This in vitro study evaluates the influence of substrate darkening, resin cement shade and zirconia thickness on the final colour of monolithic Prettau®2 zirconia restorations. An in vitro factorial design was used combining four resin substrates simulating increasing darkening (ND6–ND9), three shades of dual-cure resin cement (universal, transparent, white opaque) and three zirconia thicknesses (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 mm) of Prettau®2 zirconia. Standardized photographs were taken under controlled conditions, and CIELAB coordinates (L*, a*, b*) were obtained in Adobe Photoshop. Colour differences relative to the Prettau®2 A1 shade tab were calculated as ΔL*, Δa*, Δb* and ΔE*. An additive linear model on ΔE* and a main-effect MANOVA on ΔL*, Δa* and Δb* were fitted to assess the impact of each factor. The mean ΔE* was 6.67 ± 2.66, and all but two specimens showed a clinically perceptible colour difference (ΔE* > 2.7) from the A1 shade tab. Substrate shade accounted for 38.4% of the explained variance in ΔE*, cement for 27.6% and zirconia thickness for 6.7%. MANOVA confirmed significant multivariate effects of substrate and cement, but not of zirconia thickness. Translucent monolithic zirconia showed limited ability to reproduce the A1 reference shade over darkened substrates. Substrate shade was the main determinant of colour mismatch, followed by resin cement, whereas zirconia thickness within 0.5–1.5 mm played a minor role. White opaque cement reduced ΔE* and brought the final shade closer to A1, but residual mismatches often remained clinically relevant. These findings highlight the need to control and, when possible, modify the underlying substrate and to select high-opacity cements when shade matching is critical.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surfaces
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/surfaces9010027
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Colorimetric Behaviour of Ceramic Zirconia Restorations Cemented on Darkened Substrates—In Vitro Study

Fernando Guerra, Cristiano Pereira Alves, Ana Messias, Ricardo Dias et al.
Surfaces
Dental materials and restorations
article

Colorimetric Behaviour of Ceramic Zirconia Restorations Cemented on Darkened Substrates—In Vitro Study

Fernando Guerra, Cristiano Pereira Alves, Ana Messias, Ricardo Dias, Raul Yehudi
article en

Abstract

The colour matching of ceramic restorations is sensitive to ceramic thickness, ceramic optical properties, the tooth region, the tooth/substrate basis colour, and the shade of the bonding agent. This in vitro study evaluates the influence of substrate darkening, resin cement shade and zirconia thickness on the final colour of monolithic Prettau®2 zirconia restorations. An in vitro factorial design was used combining four resin substrates simulating increasing darkening (ND6–ND9), three shades of dual-cure resin cement (universal, transparent, white opaque) and three zirconia thicknesses (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 mm) of Prettau®2 zirconia. Standardized photographs were taken under controlled conditions, and CIELAB coordinates (L*, a*, b*) were obtained in Adobe Photoshop. Colour differences relative to the Prettau®2 A1 shade tab were calculated as ΔL*, Δa*, Δb* and ΔE*. An additive linear model on ΔE* and a main-effect MANOVA on ΔL*, Δa* and Δb* were fitted to assess the impact of each factor. The mean ΔE* was 6.67 ± 2.66, and all but two specimens showed a clinically perceptible colour difference (ΔE* > 2.7) from the A1 shade tab. Substrate shade accounted for 38.4% of the explained variance in ΔE*, cement for 27.6% and zirconia thickness for 6.7%. MANOVA confirmed significant multivariate effects of substrate and cement, but not of zirconia thickness. Translucent monolithic zirconia showed limited ability to reproduce the A1 reference shade over darkened substrates. Substrate shade was the main determinant of colour mismatch, followed by resin cement, whereas zirconia thickness within 0.5–1.5 mm played a minor role. White opaque cement reduced ΔE* and brought the final shade closer to A1, but residual mismatches often remained clinically relevant. These findings highlight the need to control and, when possible, modify the underlying substrate and to select high-opacity cements when shade matching is critical.

SurfacesVol. 9(1)
Universidade do Porto (PT), University of Coimbra (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.