Mixed Methods to Advance Global Health Research on Gender-Based Violence Syndemics: A New Research Framework

Emerging studies from low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC) have applied mixed methods to investigate gender-based violence (GBV) syndemics. There is currently no guidance on how to appropriately combine qualitative and quantitative methods when testing syndemic theory. This research introduces a mixed methods framework for testing GBV syndemics in LMIC. A multi-step approach was used for framework development. The framework centers on the distinct strengths of the population perspective (quantitative) and locally grounded perspective (qualitative) and informs the development of (i) measurement tools, (ii) causal models, and (iii) contextual interventions. This article contributes an application of mixed methods to inform the design of studies that robustly test theoretical constructs. Further, this article demonstrates how a sensitive/hidden exposure like GBV contributes to the patterning of chronic and infectious diseases, leading to population health disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898261431147
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed Methods to Advance Global Health Research on Gender-Based Violence Syndemics: A New Research Framework

Luissa Vahedi, L. S. Stark, Alexander C. Tsai, Ilana Seff
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Mixed Methods to Advance Global Health Research on Gender-Based Violence Syndemics: A New Research Framework

Luissa Vahedi, L. S. Stark, Alexander C. Tsai, Ilana Seff
article en

Abstract

Emerging studies from low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC) have applied mixed methods to investigate gender-based violence (GBV) syndemics. There is currently no guidance on how to appropriately combine qualitative and quantitative methods when testing syndemic theory. This research introduces a mixed methods framework for testing GBV syndemics in LMIC. A multi-step approach was used for framework development. The framework centers on the distinct strengths of the population perspective (quantitative) and locally grounded perspective (qualitative) and informs the development of (i) measurement tools, (ii) causal models, and (iii) contextual interventions. This article contributes an application of mixed methods to inform the design of studies that robustly test theoretical constructs. Further, this article demonstrates how a sensitive/hidden exposure like GBV contributes to the patterning of chronic and infectious diseases, leading to population health disparities.

Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Harvard University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.