Optimising Human– <scp>AI</scp> Decision Performance: A Trust and Capability Framework for Knowledge Management

ABSTRACT Organisations struggle to optimise human–AI collaboration in knowledge‐intensive decision‐making. This paper proposes the Trust–Complementarity Model of Collective Intelligence (TCM‐CI), explaining how calibrated trust and complementary capability utilisation drive superior organisational performance. Through systematic synthesis of human–AI interaction and knowledge management research, we identify three core mechanisms: (1) calibrated trust maximises collective intelligence by balancing appropriate reliance with necessary oversight, (2) complementarity–trust interaction determines optimal performance when high capability utilisation combines with appropriate trust levels and (3) dynamic feedback loops create reinforcing organisational learning cycles. The framework provides practical guidance for executives designing human–AI teams, developing trust calibration training, and establishing performance metrics. By integrating psychological trust factors with cognitive capability optimisation, this model offers actionable insights for knowledge management practitioners implementing AI‐augmented decision systems while advancing theoretical understanding of human–AI collaboration effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge and Process Management
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.70059
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimising Human– AI Decision Performance: A Trust and Capability Framework for Knowledge Management

Eduardo Carlos Dittmar, Martin Sposato
Knowledge and Process Management
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Optimising Human– AI Decision Performance: A Trust and Capability Framework for Knowledge Management

Eduardo Carlos Dittmar, Martin Sposato
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Organisations struggle to optimise human–AI collaboration in knowledge‐intensive decision‐making. This paper proposes the Trust–Complementarity Model of Collective Intelligence (TCM‐CI), explaining how calibrated trust and complementary capability utilisation drive superior organisational performance. Through systematic synthesis of human–AI interaction and knowledge management research, we identify three core mechanisms: (1) calibrated trust maximises collective intelligence by balancing appropriate reliance with necessary oversight, (2) complementarity–trust interaction determines optimal performance when high capability utilisation combines with appropriate trust levels and (3) dynamic feedback loops create reinforcing organisational learning cycles. The framework provides practical guidance for executives designing human–AI teams, developing trust calibration training, and establishing performance metrics. By integrating psychological trust factors with cognitive capability optimisation, this model offers actionable insights for knowledge management practitioners implementing AI‐augmented decision systems while advancing theoretical understanding of human–AI collaboration effectiveness.

Knowledge and Process Management
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES), Zayed University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.