Employees’ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Green Ergonomics: Development and Validation of the GEQ

Organizations face increasing pressure to reduce their environmental impact while preserving worker health, well-being, and performance. While sustainability research increasingly emphasizes organizational and human dimensions, validated tools assessing how environmental sustainability is integrated into ergonomic practice remain limited. Green ergonomics provides a systemic framework linking human factors and environmental objectives in sustainable work system design. This study aimed to develop and validate the Green Ergonomics Questionnaire (GEQ), a psychometric instrument designed to assess employees’ perceptions of organizational readiness to integrate sustainability into ergonomic practice. The GEQ was developed through a structured literature review, expert evaluation, and empirical validation using data from 412 employees across multiple occupational sectors. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a seven-factor structure including knowledge, training and organizational learning, organizational practices, perceived impacts, obstacles, organizational culture, and employee involvement. Reliability indices indicated satisfactory internal consistency (α = 0.78–0.86; CR = 0.80–0.88), and convergent and discriminant validity were supported. Overall, the GEQ provides a structured framework to assess employees’ perceptions of how environmental sustainability is embedded within ergonomic and participatory work system design processes, contributing to research at the intersection of ergonomics, sustainability management, and organizational change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18062785
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Human Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Employees’ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Green Ergonomics: Development and Validation of the GEQ

Nicolas Bert
Sustainability
Ergonomics and Human Factors
article

Employees’ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Green Ergonomics: Development and Validation of the GEQ

Nicolas Bert
article en

Abstract

Organizations face increasing pressure to reduce their environmental impact while preserving worker health, well-being, and performance. While sustainability research increasingly emphasizes organizational and human dimensions, validated tools assessing how environmental sustainability is integrated into ergonomic practice remain limited. Green ergonomics provides a systemic framework linking human factors and environmental objectives in sustainable work system design. This study aimed to develop and validate the Green Ergonomics Questionnaire (GEQ), a psychometric instrument designed to assess employees’ perceptions of organizational readiness to integrate sustainability into ergonomic practice. The GEQ was developed through a structured literature review, expert evaluation, and empirical validation using data from 412 employees across multiple occupational sectors. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a seven-factor structure including knowledge, training and organizational learning, organizational practices, perceived impacts, obstacles, organizational culture, and employee involvement. Reliability indices indicated satisfactory internal consistency (α = 0.78–0.86; CR = 0.80–0.88), and convergent and discriminant validity were supported. Overall, the GEQ provides a structured framework to assess employees’ perceptions of how environmental sustainability is embedded within ergonomic and participatory work system design processes, contributing to research at the intersection of ergonomics, sustainability management, and organizational change.

SustainabilityVol. 18(6)
Université de technologie de belfort-montbéliard (FR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ergonomics and Human Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.