Investigating the effects of 4C teaching model on creativity and student learning in robotics education: an action research study

With the increasing complexity of scientific and social issues, students should develop creativity through an interdisciplinary lens to build a sustainable future. As the quintessential integrative STEM education, robotics education is an important way to cultivate creativity, as its engineering design process aligns with the nature of creativity. However, current pedagogical limitations hinder robotics education from effectively fostering student creativity. This study figured out a 4C teaching model based on the interplay between the two core cognitive components of creativity (i.e., divergent and convergent thinking). To validate the effects of this model, three iterations of action research were conducted in a robotics course during 2021–2023 at a university in China. Questionnaires, classroom observations, and interviews were used to evaluate students’ creativity and learning outcomes (e.g., interdisciplinary concepts, engineering design skills, collaborative abilities, and cognitive load). The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was performed to compare the pre-test and post-test of all dimensions in each iteration. Results indicated that there was a significant difference in students’ creativity, interdisciplinary concepts, engineering design skills, and collaborative abilities, but no significant difference in students’ cognitive load before and after the implementation of the 4C model. The possible reasons, implications, and future research are also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06870-4
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the effects of 4C teaching model on creativity and student learning in robotics education: an action research study

Xiaofan Liu, Baichang Zhong
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Teaching and Learning Programming
article

Investigating the effects of 4C teaching model on creativity and student learning in robotics education: an action research study

Xiaofan Liu, Baichang Zhong
article en

Abstract

With the increasing complexity of scientific and social issues, students should develop creativity through an interdisciplinary lens to build a sustainable future. As the quintessential integrative STEM education, robotics education is an important way to cultivate creativity, as its engineering design process aligns with the nature of creativity. However, current pedagogical limitations hinder robotics education from effectively fostering student creativity. This study figured out a 4C teaching model based on the interplay between the two core cognitive components of creativity (i.e., divergent and convergent thinking). To validate the effects of this model, three iterations of action research were conducted in a robotics course during 2021–2023 at a university in China. Questionnaires, classroom observations, and interviews were used to evaluate students’ creativity and learning outcomes (e.g., interdisciplinary concepts, engineering design skills, collaborative abilities, and cognitive load). The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was performed to compare the pre-test and post-test of all dimensions in each iteration. Results indicated that there was a significant difference in students’ creativity, interdisciplinary concepts, engineering design skills, and collaborative abilities, but no significant difference in students’ cognitive load before and after the implementation of the 4C model. The possible reasons, implications, and future research are also discussed.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
South China Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.