Representation and artefactualism: towards a synergic understanding of scientific modelling

In their investigation on the epistemic role of scientific models, many philosophers of science have historically focused on scientific representation. In this received view, a model serves as a system that represents a target system – a portion of phenomena of interest. However, this representational view has been criticised, particularly by proponents of so-called artefactualism. This view contrasts models’ artefactual nature with the representational perspective. This paper has two aims. First, it clarifies the points of disagreement between artefactualism and the representational view I support, which bases representation on interpretation, denotation, exemplification and de-idealisation functions – rather than similarity or isomorphism. Second, it offers a synergistic solution that incorporates several insights of artefactualism within a more sophisticated representational account.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05490-4
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representation and artefactualism: towards a synergic understanding of scientific modelling

Lorenzo Sartori
Synthese
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Representation and artefactualism: towards a synergic understanding of scientific modelling

Lorenzo Sartori
article en

Abstract

In their investigation on the epistemic role of scientific models, many philosophers of science have historically focused on scientific representation. In this received view, a model serves as a system that represents a target system – a portion of phenomena of interest. However, this representational view has been criticised, particularly by proponents of so-called artefactualism. This view contrasts models’ artefactual nature with the representational perspective. This paper has two aims. First, it clarifies the points of disagreement between artefactualism and the representational view I support, which bases representation on interpretation, denotation, exemplification and de-idealisation functions – rather than similarity or isomorphism. Second, it offers a synergistic solution that incorporates several insights of artefactualism within a more sophisticated representational account.

SyntheseVol. 207(3)
University of Sheffield (GB)
Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.