Charting Sex Work in Malta: First Steps

Sex work is a contested issue in academic, political, and public discourse, often polarised between abolitionist and labour rights perspectives. In Malta, where local research remains scarce, legal ambiguities, criminalisation, and stigma push sex work underground, exacerbating precarious conditions and restricting access to healthcare, legal protection, and social support. Despite ongoing public debates on regulatory reform, the absence of local empirical evidence allows misconceptions and legal uncertainties to persist. This article provides the first descriptive mapping of Malta’s sex work landscape rooted in empirical research. It integrates data from two independent research projects based on interviews with 81 participants, including sex workers (n = 45), non-sex-working stakeholders (n = 35), and one ‘pimp’. The aim is to offer preliminary insights into sex work in Malta across four key dimensions – actors, spaces, tools, and time – and present a nuanced analytical framework beyond traditional hierarchical approaches to sex work. The findings highlight the diversity of sex workers’ backgrounds in Malta, spanning different genders, nationalities, and socioeconomic circumstances. While some participants operate independently, including through digital platforms, others work under varying degrees of third-party management, revealing a spectrum of autonomy and constraint. Street-based workers face heightened risks of violence and police scrutiny, whereas digital platforms present both new opportunities and emerging vulnerabilities. In addition, entrenched stigma, unclear legal frameworks, and exclusionary service provision further hinder sex workers’ access to essential healthcare and legal protection. This study contributes empirical evidence to inform policy and public debate by documenting these complexities, challenging moralistic narratives, and advocating for an evidence-based approach. We encourage future research to expand this framework, engage with larger and comparative samples, and centre policy discussions on the lived realities of sex work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological Research Online
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804261421049
Primary Topic
Sex work and related issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Charting Sex Work in Malta: First Steps

Jonathan Camilleri, Isotta Rossoni
Sociological Research Online
Sex work and related issues
article

Charting Sex Work in Malta: First Steps

Jonathan Camilleri, Isotta Rossoni
article en

Abstract

Sex work is a contested issue in academic, political, and public discourse, often polarised between abolitionist and labour rights perspectives. In Malta, where local research remains scarce, legal ambiguities, criminalisation, and stigma push sex work underground, exacerbating precarious conditions and restricting access to healthcare, legal protection, and social support. Despite ongoing public debates on regulatory reform, the absence of local empirical evidence allows misconceptions and legal uncertainties to persist. This article provides the first descriptive mapping of Malta’s sex work landscape rooted in empirical research. It integrates data from two independent research projects based on interviews with 81 participants, including sex workers (n = 45), non-sex-working stakeholders (n = 35), and one ‘pimp’. The aim is to offer preliminary insights into sex work in Malta across four key dimensions – actors, spaces, tools, and time – and present a nuanced analytical framework beyond traditional hierarchical approaches to sex work. The findings highlight the diversity of sex workers’ backgrounds in Malta, spanning different genders, nationalities, and socioeconomic circumstances. While some participants operate independently, including through digital platforms, others work under varying degrees of third-party management, revealing a spectrum of autonomy and constraint. Street-based workers face heightened risks of violence and police scrutiny, whereas digital platforms present both new opportunities and emerging vulnerabilities. In addition, entrenched stigma, unclear legal frameworks, and exclusionary service provision further hinder sex workers’ access to essential healthcare and legal protection. This study contributes empirical evidence to inform policy and public debate by documenting these complexities, challenging moralistic narratives, and advocating for an evidence-based approach. We encourage future research to expand this framework, engage with larger and comparative samples, and centre policy discussions on the lived realities of sex work.

Sociological Research Online
Leiden University (NL), University College London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Sex work and related issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.