Ecosystem valuation: Concept, criteria and terminology
Abstract Furlaud et al. (2025) discussed how to measure ‘ecosystem condition’. Here, we argue that the term ‘ecosystem valuation’ should be preferred. ‘Valuation’ signals clearly that a social or political value judgement is being made about which ecosystem states to rate most highly. Furlaud et al. interpreted condition as similarity to a preindustrial or reference state. However, many different criteria have been proposed for valuing different ecosystem states. The word condition risks giving the impression that ecosystem science has arrived objectively at a single criterion. We recommend also that particular criteria for valuation should be named in a way that summarizes what they actually are: for example, conservation of endangered species, pastoral value, carbon storage or similarity to preindustrial.
Authors
- David Coleman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1773-6597)
- Mark Westoby (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7690-4530)
- Martyna M. Kotowska (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2283-5979)
- Ian Watson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9814-7152)
- Max Mallen‐Cooper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-8728)
- Julian Schrader (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8392-211X)
- David J. Eldridge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-486X)
- Robert M. Kooyman
Institutions
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Environmental Earth Sciences (AU)
- Macquarie University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Published
- 2026-03-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.70279
- Primary Topic
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00