Correction: Clinical feasibility of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients on glucocorticoids or immunomodulators: Propensity-score-matched study

Pain n = 24 (9 GC/IM vs 15 standard) Analgetics n = 8 (33.3 %, 5 vs 3) Antipyretics n = 0 (0 %) Antibiotics n = 2 (8.3 %, 1 vs 1)Analgetics n = 2 (50 %, 2 vs 0) Antipyretics n = 2 (50 %, 2 vs 0) Antibiotics n = 1 (25 %, 1 vs 1)Analgetics n = 0 (0 %) Antipyretics n = 0 (0 %) Antibiotics n = 2 (2.5 %, 0 vs 2) C10

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy International Open
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2823-6852
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction: Clinical feasibility of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients on glucocorticoids or immunomodulators: Propensity-score-matched study

Yorinobu Sumida, Akihisa Ohno, Taisuke Sasaki, Hitoshi Homma et al.
Endoscopy International Open
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Correction: Clinical feasibility of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients on glucocorticoids or immunomodulators: Propensity-score-matched study

Yorinobu Sumida, Akihisa Ohno, Taisuke Sasaki, Hitoshi Homma, Hiroki Fukuya, Ryota Okitsu, Naohiko Harada, Shuichi Itonaga, Eikichi Ihara, Yoichiro Iboshi, Akito Ohkubo, Daisuke Yoshimura, Mitsuru Esaki, Shohei Hamada
article en

Abstract

Pain n = 24 (9 GC/IM vs 15 standard) Analgetics n = 8 (33.3 %, 5 vs 3) Antipyretics n = 0 (0 %) Antibiotics n = 2 (8.3 %, 1 vs 1)Analgetics n = 2 (50 %, 2 vs 0) Antipyretics n = 2 (50 %, 2 vs 0) Antibiotics n = 1 (25 %, 1 vs 1)Analgetics n = 0 (0 %) Antipyretics n = 0 (0 %) Antibiotics n = 2 (2.5 %, 0 vs 2) C10

Endoscopy International OpenVol. 14(CP)
Kyushu University (JP), National Kyushu Medical Center (JP), Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.