Territorial insights into agri-food system circularity: energy and nitrogen flows of two livestock production regions in Brittany (France)

Regions of intensive farming are often associated with large nutrient surpluses emitted from agri-food systems (AFS). Agricultural transitions require reaching a balance between the roles of livestock systems in producing high-quality protein and organic fertilizers, while mitigating pollutant emissions. However, effects of the relative percentages of ruminants and monogastric animals in regions with high livestock density on their food production and environmental impacts remain unexplored. While most research on nutrient flows in AFS focuses mainly on large scales (e.g. continents, countries), the territorial scale remains underexplored. This study aimed to develop an integrated, down-scaled (NUTS 3) assessment framework to analyze nitrogen (N) and energy flows in two territories with differing compositions of ruminants and monogastric animals. Using material flow analysis based on public data, we examined two neighboring territories in Brittany, France. We assessed their environmental impacts, N flows, and energy functioning. The two territories imported 38% and 62% of N in feed, respectively, producing enough animal products to meet 9–13 times their local need for animal-based food. The results suggest that the area of external agricultural land required for producing feed imports is as large as the used agricultural area in the territory. Energy from biogas production represented 20% of the total energy input of the AFS. The territory with a more balanced share of ruminants and monogastric animals had higher livestock N conversion efficiency (37% vs. 30%) but lower total N self-sufficiency (21% vs. 12%) than the more ruminant-dominant territory. These results provide novel insights into environmental impacts of multiple combinations of ruminant and monogastric animal systems in similar territories. Such results could be useful for local policymakers and AFS stakeholders to help them understand the impacts of different livestock combinations on N and energy flows in their territory. The study also provides a framework for subnational-scale assessments, which are not well represented in public data. This framework is a key first step to facilitate the transition toward more sustainable AFS. • Nitrogen and energy flows in two livestock agri-food systems were compared. • Detailed multi-scale analysis of 69 nitrogen flows was performed. • N-use efficiency averaged 46% for the two agri-food systems. • Energy from biogas production was 20% of total energy input.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Systems
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2026.104698
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Territorial insights into agri-food system circularity: energy and nitrogen flows of two livestock production regions in Brittany (France)

Souhil Harchaoui, Olivier Godinot, Leopold Iachkine, Julie Ryschawy
Agricultural Systems
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Territorial insights into agri-food system circularity: energy and nitrogen flows of two livestock production regions in Brittany (France)

Souhil Harchaoui, Olivier Godinot, Leopold Iachkine, Julie Ryschawy
article en

Abstract

Regions of intensive farming are often associated with large nutrient surpluses emitted from agri-food systems (AFS). Agricultural transitions require reaching a balance between the roles of livestock systems in producing high-quality protein and organic fertilizers, while mitigating pollutant emissions. However, effects of the relative percentages of ruminants and monogastric animals in regions with high livestock density on their food production and environmental impacts remain unexplored. While most research on nutrient flows in AFS focuses mainly on large scales (e.g. continents, countries), the territorial scale remains underexplored. This study aimed to develop an integrated, down-scaled (NUTS 3) assessment framework to analyze nitrogen (N) and energy flows in two territories with differing compositions of ruminants and monogastric animals. Using material flow analysis based on public data, we examined two neighboring territories in Brittany, France. We assessed their environmental impacts, N flows, and energy functioning. The two territories imported 38% and 62% of N in feed, respectively, producing enough animal products to meet 9–13 times their local need for animal-based food. The results suggest that the area of external agricultural land required for producing feed imports is as large as the used agricultural area in the territory. Energy from biogas production represented 20% of the total energy input of the AFS. The territory with a more balanced share of ruminants and monogastric animals had higher livestock N conversion efficiency (37% vs. 30%) but lower total N self-sufficiency (21% vs. 12%) than the more ruminant-dominant territory. These results provide novel insights into environmental impacts of multiple combinations of ruminant and monogastric animal systems in similar territories. Such results could be useful for local policymakers and AFS stakeholders to help them understand the impacts of different livestock combinations on N and energy flows in their territory. The study also provides a framework for subnational-scale assessments, which are not well represented in public data. This framework is a key first step to facilitate the transition toward more sustainable AFS. • Nitrogen and energy flows in two livestock agri-food systems were compared. • Detailed multi-scale analysis of 69 nitrogen flows was performed. • N-use efficiency averaged 46% for the two agri-food systems. • Energy from biogas production was 20% of total energy input.

Agricultural SystemsVol. 235
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), AGroecologies, Innovations & Ruralities (FR), Génétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.