Integrating indigenous methodologies into medical education in the west: a conceptual framework for the Hybrid Relational Clerkship Model (HRCM)

Despite growing attention to equity and cultural safety in medical education, Indigenous methodologies remain largely absent from the core structure of clinical training in Canada and America. Current clerkship models are short-term and transactional, emphasizing biomedical exposure rather than sustained relational learning. This disconnect perpetuates inequities and mistrust between Indigenous communities and healthcare institutions. To address this gap, this paper proposes a Hybrid Relational Clerkship Model (HRCM) that integrates Indigenous methodologies—particularly relationality, reciprocity, and land-based learning—within longitudinal clerkship structures. Using a qualitative, interpretive, and literature-based approach, this conceptual study resulted from a narrative review of academic and institutional sources from ten Canadian and U.S. medical schools to analyze how Indigenous and community-based learning are currently represented in clerkship design. Indigenous-authored literature, frameworks such as Two-Eyed Seeing (Etuaptmumk), and principles of the Four R’s (Respect, Responsibility, Relevance, Reciprocity)—guided the analysis. Findings from Indigenous and Western medical education scholarship were synthesized to develop the HRCM as a conceptual framework for curriculum redesign. The review identified a persistent reliance on short-term rural placements that meet accreditation standards but do not foster relational continuity or accountability to Indigenous communities. One Canadian Medical institution demonstrated a longitudinal, community-embedded Indigenous clerkship model -. The proposed HRCM reframes clerkship as an 8–12-month placement emphasizing dual mentorship (Indigenous and biomedical), community co-governance, and Two-Eyed Seeing–based assessment. The model aligns with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action 22–24 -, the CACMS Standard 9.5 on narrative assessment, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 10 (Reduced Inequalities). The HRCM provides a conceptual framework for integrating Indigenous knowledge systems as core pedagogical foundations in medical education, moving beyond cultural awareness toward structural reconciliation. By embedding relationality, reciprocity, and community-led assessment into clerkship design, this model supports the development of physicians who are both clinically competent and culturally accountable. Implementing this framework may enhance trust, continuity, and health outcomes in Indigenous communities while contributing to a more equitable and inclusive medical education system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08974-6
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating indigenous methodologies into medical education in the west: a conceptual framework for the Hybrid Relational Clerkship Model (HRCM)

Lloy Wylie, Taraneh Torabi
BMC Medical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Integrating indigenous methodologies into medical education in the west: a conceptual framework for the Hybrid Relational Clerkship Model (HRCM)

Lloy Wylie, Taraneh Torabi
article en

Abstract

Despite growing attention to equity and cultural safety in medical education, Indigenous methodologies remain largely absent from the core structure of clinical training in Canada and America. Current clerkship models are short-term and transactional, emphasizing biomedical exposure rather than sustained relational learning. This disconnect perpetuates inequities and mistrust between Indigenous communities and healthcare institutions. To address this gap, this paper proposes a Hybrid Relational Clerkship Model (HRCM) that integrates Indigenous methodologies—particularly relationality, reciprocity, and land-based learning—within longitudinal clerkship structures. Using a qualitative, interpretive, and literature-based approach, this conceptual study resulted from a narrative review of academic and institutional sources from ten Canadian and U.S. medical schools to analyze how Indigenous and community-based learning are currently represented in clerkship design. Indigenous-authored literature, frameworks such as Two-Eyed Seeing (Etuaptmumk), and principles of the Four R’s (Respect, Responsibility, Relevance, Reciprocity)—guided the analysis. Findings from Indigenous and Western medical education scholarship were synthesized to develop the HRCM as a conceptual framework for curriculum redesign. The review identified a persistent reliance on short-term rural placements that meet accreditation standards but do not foster relational continuity or accountability to Indigenous communities. One Canadian Medical institution demonstrated a longitudinal, community-embedded Indigenous clerkship model -. The proposed HRCM reframes clerkship as an 8–12-month placement emphasizing dual mentorship (Indigenous and biomedical), community co-governance, and Two-Eyed Seeing–based assessment. The model aligns with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action 22–24 -, the CACMS Standard 9.5 on narrative assessment, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 10 (Reduced Inequalities). The HRCM provides a conceptual framework for integrating Indigenous knowledge systems as core pedagogical foundations in medical education, moving beyond cultural awareness toward structural reconciliation. By embedding relationality, reciprocity, and community-led assessment into clerkship design, this model supports the development of physicians who are both clinically competent and culturally accountable. Implementing this framework may enhance trust, continuity, and health outcomes in Indigenous communities while contributing to a more equitable and inclusive medical education system.

BMC Medical Education
Western University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.