Integrating Finite Element Simulation with Actual GTAW Weld Profiles to Optimize Root Height in Stainless Steel 316L Pipe Joints

Weld root reinforcement is a critical geometric parameter governing stress concentration and structural performance in thin-walled stainless-steel piping systems designed to ASME B31.3. While current codes specify permissible dimensional limits, they do not explicitly quantify how incremental variations in root height influence stress distribution under realistic service loading conditions. This study integrates finite element analysis (FEA) with experimentally validated GTAW weld profiles to evaluate the structural influence of weld root height in 316L stainless-steel pipe joints. An experimentally manufactured 4 in schedule 10S joint with a measured root height of less than 1.5 mm was adopted as the baseline geometry. Additional models with reinforcement heights of 1.138, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mm were evaluated under two representative load cases: (i) internal pressure combined with drag and axial thrust (LC-1), and (ii) internal pressure with thrust only (LC-2). The results demonstrate that reinforcement heights exceeding 2.0 mm increase von Mises, hoop, longitudinal, and radial stress gradients, with peak stresses shifting toward the weld toe under drag-inclusive loading. In contrast, reinforcement ≤2 mm provides smoother load transfer and reduced stiffness discontinuity across the weld interface. The combined numerical and experimental findings support a stress-informed upper limit of 2 mm for weld root reinforcement in thin-walled stainless-steel pipelines, offering a performance-based complement to existing dimensional acceptance criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19061088
Primary Topic
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Finite Element Simulation with Actual GTAW Weld Profiles to Optimize Root Height in Stainless Steel 316L Pipe Joints

Aravinthan Arumugam, V. K. Sharma, Mohammad Sohel
Materials
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
article

Integrating Finite Element Simulation with Actual GTAW Weld Profiles to Optimize Root Height in Stainless Steel 316L Pipe Joints

Aravinthan Arumugam, V. K. Sharma, Mohammad Sohel
article en

Abstract

Weld root reinforcement is a critical geometric parameter governing stress concentration and structural performance in thin-walled stainless-steel piping systems designed to ASME B31.3. While current codes specify permissible dimensional limits, they do not explicitly quantify how incremental variations in root height influence stress distribution under realistic service loading conditions. This study integrates finite element analysis (FEA) with experimentally validated GTAW weld profiles to evaluate the structural influence of weld root height in 316L stainless-steel pipe joints. An experimentally manufactured 4 in schedule 10S joint with a measured root height of less than 1.5 mm was adopted as the baseline geometry. Additional models with reinforcement heights of 1.138, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mm were evaluated under two representative load cases: (i) internal pressure combined with drag and axial thrust (LC-1), and (ii) internal pressure with thrust only (LC-2). The results demonstrate that reinforcement heights exceeding 2.0 mm increase von Mises, hoop, longitudinal, and radial stress gradients, with peak stresses shifting toward the weld toe under drag-inclusive loading. In contrast, reinforcement ≤2 mm provides smoother load transfer and reduced stiffness discontinuity across the weld interface. The combined numerical and experimental findings support a stress-informed upper limit of 2 mm for weld root reinforcement in thin-walled stainless-steel pipelines, offering a performance-based complement to existing dimensional acceptance criteria.

MaterialsVol. 19(6)
Florida Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.