Major haemorrhage and blood product utilisation in patients receiving VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock: a multicentre observational study (OBLEX)

Haemorrhage and blood product usage are common in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) and associated with increased mortality. A prospective, investigator-initiated, longitudinal observational cohort study on major haemorrhagic events in 12 ECMO centres from 3 continents for three predefined subgroups (VA ECMO initiated during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), after cardiothoracic surgery (CTS), for cardiogenic shock (CS)). The aim was to describe haemorrhagic complications as well as transfusion practice and anticoagulation for the whole population as well as the subgroups. In addition, independent baseline predictors for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions were evaluated. 545 prospective patients were included between 2019 and 2022 (ECPR 149, CTS 169, CS 227). Hospital mortality was 46%. Over 2796 days 406 major haemorrhage events in 286 (52%) patients were recorded. CTS and ECPR patients had more frequent events occurring earlier in their course. 88% received RBC transfusions (1.27 (95%CI 1.22 – 1.31) units/day) with significantly more transfusions for CTS and ECPR patients. Platelet transfusion rates were highest in the CTS group (0.58 (95%CI 0.53–0.64) units/day). Haemoglobin and platelet count prior to transfusion were independent of subgroups and averaged (78 g/L (IQR 73, 84), 58 × 10^9/L (IQR 37, 85), respectively). However, platelet count prior transfusion was only marginally higher on days with major haemorrhage (74 × 10^9/L (IQR 50, 104). Systemic anticoagulation was started within the first 24 h in 83% (95% CI 80–87%) of patients, most frequently in CS patients (90%, CI 85–95%). Independent baseline predictors for RBC transfusion were ECPR (IRR 1.50, 95%CI 1.19–1.89) and prior use of antiplatelets (IRR: 1.43, 95%CI 1.13–1.80). Myocarditis and pulmonary embolism were associated with a lower rate of transfusion when compared to myocardial infarct (IRR: 0.57 (0.37–0.89), IRR: 0.67 (0.45–1.00, respectively). Haemorrhagic complications differ in clinical subgroups and RBC transfusion exposure is by far higher than in other critically unwell populations. We identified ECPR and antiplatelet therapy as additional predictors. Transfusion practice for RBC and platelets is variable and does not always follow international guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-05900-6
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Major haemorrhage and blood product utilisation in patients receiving VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock: a multicentre observational study (OBLEX)

James Walsham, Alexis Serra, Matthias Lubnow, Lê Thị Phương Thảo et al.
Critical Care
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Major haemorrhage and blood product utilisation in patients receiving VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock: a multicentre observational study (OBLEX)

James Walsham, Alexis Serra, Matthias Lubnow, Lê Thị Phương Thảo, James Winearls, Florian Geismann, David Gattas, Claire Reynolds, Andrew Retter, Ruan Vlok, Priya Nair, Maithri Siriwardena, Johannes Gratz, G Trummer, Melchior Gautier, Zoe McQuilten, Sally Newman, C. Hodgson, Thomas Mueller, Jan-Steffen Pooth, Koji Takeda, Anthonio Arcadipane, Vincent Pellegrino, Hergen Buscher, the International ECMO Network (ECMONet), Anders Aneman, Matthieu Schmidt, Daniel Brodie, Bentley Fulcher, Kevin Rahn, Gennaro Martucci, Kiran Shekar
article en

Abstract

Haemorrhage and blood product usage are common in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) and associated with increased mortality. A prospective, investigator-initiated, longitudinal observational cohort study on major haemorrhagic events in 12 ECMO centres from 3 continents for three predefined subgroups (VA ECMO initiated during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), after cardiothoracic surgery (CTS), for cardiogenic shock (CS)). The aim was to describe haemorrhagic complications as well as transfusion practice and anticoagulation for the whole population as well as the subgroups. In addition, independent baseline predictors for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions were evaluated. 545 prospective patients were included between 2019 and 2022 (ECPR 149, CTS 169, CS 227). Hospital mortality was 46%. Over 2796 days 406 major haemorrhage events in 286 (52%) patients were recorded. CTS and ECPR patients had more frequent events occurring earlier in their course. 88% received RBC transfusions (1.27 (95%CI 1.22 – 1.31) units/day) with significantly more transfusions for CTS and ECPR patients. Platelet transfusion rates were highest in the CTS group (0.58 (95%CI 0.53–0.64) units/day). Haemoglobin and platelet count prior to transfusion were independent of subgroups and averaged (78 g/L (IQR 73, 84), 58 × 10^9/L (IQR 37, 85), respectively). However, platelet count prior transfusion was only marginally higher on days with major haemorrhage (74 × 10^9/L (IQR 50, 104). Systemic anticoagulation was started within the first 24 h in 83% (95% CI 80–87%) of patients, most frequently in CS patients (90%, CI 85–95%). Independent baseline predictors for RBC transfusion were ECPR (IRR 1.50, 95%CI 1.19–1.89) and prior use of antiplatelets (IRR: 1.43, 95%CI 1.13–1.80). Myocarditis and pulmonary embolism were associated with a lower rate of transfusion when compared to myocardial infarct (IRR: 0.57 (0.37–0.89), IRR: 0.67 (0.45–1.00, respectively). Haemorrhagic complications differ in clinical subgroups and RBC transfusion exposure is by far higher than in other critically unwell populations. We identified ECPR and antiplatelet therapy as additional predictors. Transfusion practice for RBC and platelets is variable and does not always follow international guidelines.

Critical Care
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), The University of Queensland (AU), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Royal North Shore Hospital (AU), Gold Coast Hospital (AU), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), The Alfred Hospital (AU), University Hospital Regensburg (DE), Sorbonne Université (FR), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Monash Health (AU), Prince Charles Hospital (AU), South Western Sydney Local Health District (AU), Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IT), Franklin University (US), Monash University (AU), New York University (US), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.