Why do opposition parties boycott elections?

Election boycotts are puzzling phenomena because they appear to only confirm government victory. Although opposition parties in authoritarian regimes frequently resort to boycotts, few studies have systematically examined the motivations underlying this behaviour. To understand the incentives and conditions enabling such seemingly self-defeating behaviour, this article develops a formal model of government–opposition interaction under authoritarianism. The analysis shows that, from the perspective of resource conservation, election boycotts serve two critical functions. First, they can induce the government to act in ways desired by the opposition. In some cases, opposition parties boycott elections to deter an autocratic government from cancelling subsequent elections. Conserving resources through election boycotts strengthens their capacity to threaten the government if cancellation occurs. Second, boycotts allow opposition parties to carry over resources to overcome entry barriers that would otherwise be insurmountable. These findings contribute to the literature on democratisation by elections by clarifying the factors that sustain autocratic governments’ commitment to holding elections and those that shape opposition parties’ strategic participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Theoretical Politics
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09516298261426281
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why do opposition parties boycott elections?

Kana Inata
Journal of Theoretical Politics
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Why do opposition parties boycott elections?

Kana Inata
article en

Abstract

Election boycotts are puzzling phenomena because they appear to only confirm government victory. Although opposition parties in authoritarian regimes frequently resort to boycotts, few studies have systematically examined the motivations underlying this behaviour. To understand the incentives and conditions enabling such seemingly self-defeating behaviour, this article develops a formal model of government–opposition interaction under authoritarianism. The analysis shows that, from the perspective of resource conservation, election boycotts serve two critical functions. First, they can induce the government to act in ways desired by the opposition. In some cases, opposition parties boycott elections to deter an autocratic government from cancelling subsequent elections. Conserving resources through election boycotts strengthens their capacity to threaten the government if cancellation occurs. Second, boycotts allow opposition parties to carry over resources to overcome entry barriers that would otherwise be insurmountable. These findings contribute to the literature on democratisation by elections by clarifying the factors that sustain autocratic governments’ commitment to holding elections and those that shape opposition parties’ strategic participation.

Journal of Theoretical Politics
Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.