Twelve-month lesion reactivation after initial loading injections of faricimab in neovascular AMD: a comparison between three and four loading injections

The incidence and timing of first lesion reactivation following initial loading injections of faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were assessed, and factors related to lesion reactivation were analyzed. This retrospective study included patients with treatment-naive neovascular AMD who underwent either three or four monthly loading injections of faricimab and completed 12 months of follow-up. The incidence and timing of the first lesion reactivation following the initial loading phase were analyzed and compared between the two treatment groups (three-injection and four-injection groups). In addition, the baseline parameters associated with the risk of lesion reactivation were investigated. Seventy-seven patients were included in the study (35 in the three-injection group and 42 in the four-injection group). Lesion reactivation was observed in 72.7% of patients (56 patients) at a mean of 5.1 ± 2.3 months after the loading injections. The incidence was 74.3% with a mean time to reactivation of 5.6 ± 2.9 months in the three-injection group; it was 71.4% with a mean of 4.6 ± 1.7 months in the four-injection group. No significant difference was noted in lesion reactivation between the two groups (P = 0.983). A greater baseline central retinal thickness was significantly associated with an increased risk of lesion reactivation (P = 0.010). Administering four loading injections of faricimab may not offer a clear advantage over three injections in suppressing lesion reactivation. A treat-and-extend regimen may be more appropriate in cases with marked retinal edema than an as-needed regimen to prevent further visual deterioration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-026-04707-x
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Twelve-month lesion reactivation after initial loading injections of faricimab in neovascular AMD: a comparison between three and four loading injections

J. H. Kim, Hee Yong Han, Chul Gu Kim, Ji Hyun Lee et al.
BMC Ophthalmology
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Twelve-month lesion reactivation after initial loading injections of faricimab in neovascular AMD: a comparison between three and four loading injections

J. H. Kim, Hee Yong Han, Chul Gu Kim, Ji Hyun Lee, Sang Min Park
article en

Abstract

The incidence and timing of first lesion reactivation following initial loading injections of faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were assessed, and factors related to lesion reactivation were analyzed. This retrospective study included patients with treatment-naive neovascular AMD who underwent either three or four monthly loading injections of faricimab and completed 12 months of follow-up. The incidence and timing of the first lesion reactivation following the initial loading phase were analyzed and compared between the two treatment groups (three-injection and four-injection groups). In addition, the baseline parameters associated with the risk of lesion reactivation were investigated. Seventy-seven patients were included in the study (35 in the three-injection group and 42 in the four-injection group). Lesion reactivation was observed in 72.7% of patients (56 patients) at a mean of 5.1 ± 2.3 months after the loading injections. The incidence was 74.3% with a mean time to reactivation of 5.6 ± 2.9 months in the three-injection group; it was 71.4% with a mean of 4.6 ± 1.7 months in the four-injection group. No significant difference was noted in lesion reactivation between the two groups (P = 0.983). A greater baseline central retinal thickness was significantly associated with an increased risk of lesion reactivation (P = 0.010). Administering four loading injections of faricimab may not offer a clear advantage over three injections in suppressing lesion reactivation. A treat-and-extend regimen may be more appropriate in cases with marked retinal edema than an as-needed regimen to prevent further visual deterioration.

BMC Ophthalmology
Kim's Eye Hospital (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.