Value Efficiency in Respiratory Care Departments

Background: Respiratory care departments are experiencing an increased need to demonstrate value in the care they deliver. Value-efficiency is a concept that incorporates the value of individual treatments into the normal operations of a department. The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate respiratory care leaders’ attitudes about value-efficiency. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed via social media, professional networks, and a manager work group. The survey was targeted to directors, managers, and supervisors of respiratory care departments. We asked questions related to value efficiency. Data analysis was descriptive. Results: We received 116 responses, 86% were from managers or directors. The five most valuable services delivered were conventional mechanical ventilation (82%), noninvasive ventilation or CPAP (71%), protocol-driven care (47%), code team (44%), and rapid response team (41%). The five least valuable services delivered by respiratory care departments were electrocardiograms (63%), stress testing (44%), lung expansion therapies (41%), sleep studies staffed by the respiratory care department (36%), and smoking cessation (36%). The primary barrier to value efficiency were physician prescribing practices (68%). There was general agreement (> 50% of respondents agreed) that physicians are supportive of RT protocols (71%), value should be considered when evaluating the effectiveness of respiratory care services (95%), and would you direct your resources to more valuable services if possible (73%). Respondents did not agree that hospital administrators understand RT workflow and FTE needs (35%) and hospital administrators would be supportive if we reduced services (18%). Conclusions: There was limited consensus on what respiratory care services are the most and least valuable. Physician prescribing practice was the primary barrier to value efficiency. Nearly all respondents felt value should be considered when evaluating respiratory care services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.20244116814
Primary Topic
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Value Efficiency in Respiratory Care Departments

Carl R Hinkson, Shawna L Strickland, John Emberger, Kyle J. Rehder et al.
Respiratory Care
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
article

Value Efficiency in Respiratory Care Departments

Carl R Hinkson, Shawna L Strickland, John Emberger, Kyle J. Rehder, Katlyn Burr, Andrew G Miller, Cheryl A Hoerr, Karsten J Roberts, Brian James Smith, Jerin George Juby
article en

Abstract

Background: Respiratory care departments are experiencing an increased need to demonstrate value in the care they deliver. Value-efficiency is a concept that incorporates the value of individual treatments into the normal operations of a department. The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate respiratory care leaders’ attitudes about value-efficiency. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed via social media, professional networks, and a manager work group. The survey was targeted to directors, managers, and supervisors of respiratory care departments. We asked questions related to value efficiency. Data analysis was descriptive. Results: We received 116 responses, 86% were from managers or directors. The five most valuable services delivered were conventional mechanical ventilation (82%), noninvasive ventilation or CPAP (71%), protocol-driven care (47%), code team (44%), and rapid response team (41%). The five least valuable services delivered by respiratory care departments were electrocardiograms (63%), stress testing (44%), lung expansion therapies (41%), sleep studies staffed by the respiratory care department (36%), and smoking cessation (36%). The primary barrier to value efficiency were physician prescribing practices (68%). There was general agreement (> 50% of respondents agreed) that physicians are supportive of RT protocols (71%), value should be considered when evaluating the effectiveness of respiratory care services (95%), and would you direct your resources to more valuable services if possible (73%). Respondents did not agree that hospital administrators understand RT workflow and FTE needs (35%) and hospital administrators would be supportive if we reduced services (18%). Conclusions: There was limited consensus on what respiratory care services are the most and least valuable. Physician prescribing practice was the primary barrier to value efficiency. Nearly all respondents felt value should be considered when evaluating respiratory care services.

Respiratory CareVol. 69(10_suppl)
Christiana Care Health System (US), Providence Regional Medical Center Everett (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Phelps County Regional Medical Center (US), Nemours Children's Health System (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Rush University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.