The transformative nature of AI on academic scholarship

Abstract The use of AI in academic research offers new opportunities for knowledge creation but also creates new forms of inequality between the Global North and the Global South. This paper uses epistemic justice theory to analyze the developing “AI-Enabled Scholarship Divide. Drawing on a comprehensive synthesis of existing empirical studies from Africa, Asia and Latin America, this paper illustrates how differential access to AI technologies, computational infrastructure and developmental capacity may be creating a two-tier system of knowledge generation. The paper advances the discourse by proposing concrete governance frameworks, including international AI commons modeled on CERN, modular open-source research AI libraries, and regional computational centers. It also introduces specific capacity-building approaches such as university-based AI makerspaces and South-South research networks, alongside design principles for culturally-appropriate AI that respect indigenous knowledge systems and local epistemologies. The findings suggest that, while technical solutions are necessary, achieving epistemic justice through AI mediation in scholarly processes likely requires fundamental attention to underlying power structures in the global production of knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.00032.wri
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The transformative nature of AI on academic scholarship

Steven A. Wright
Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The transformative nature of AI on academic scholarship

Steven A. Wright
article en

Abstract

Abstract The use of AI in academic research offers new opportunities for knowledge creation but also creates new forms of inequality between the Global North and the Global South. This paper uses epistemic justice theory to analyze the developing “AI-Enabled Scholarship Divide. Drawing on a comprehensive synthesis of existing empirical studies from Africa, Asia and Latin America, this paper illustrates how differential access to AI technologies, computational infrastructure and developmental capacity may be creating a two-tier system of knowledge generation. The paper advances the discourse by proposing concrete governance frameworks, including international AI commons modeled on CERN, modular open-source research AI libraries, and regional computational centers. It also introduces specific capacity-building approaches such as university-based AI makerspaces and South-South research networks, alongside design principles for culturally-appropriate AI that respect indigenous knowledge systems and local epistemologies. The findings suggest that, while technical solutions are necessary, achieving epistemic justice through AI mediation in scholarly processes likely requires fundamental attention to underlying power structures in the global production of knowledge.

Journal of English for Research Publication PurposesVol. 6(2)
Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.