Diversity and Subjectivity of Model Uncertainty Specification in Global Tuna Stock Assessment

ABSTRACT As a major source of scientific uncertainty in stock assessments and fisheries management, model uncertainty in tuna stock assessments is primarily examined using sensitivity analysis and ensemble modelling. However, uncertainty specifications (i.e., factors and levels included in uncertainty analyses) for tuna assessments vary within and among tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (tRFMOs). We reviewed the uncertainty specification in 133 stock assessments conducted over the past 20 years by five tRFMOs, covering seven major commercial tuna species. Our analysis revealed four key findings: although a wide range of uncertainty specifications has been applied, only a few factors are commonly considered across assessments; patterns in uncertainty specification are more closely aligned with management organisation than with species; the emphasis on different factors has shifted over time (e.g., increasing attention to growth and decreasing focus on data weighting); and a change to the modelling platform is a key factor leading to changing uncertainty specifications between successive assessments. Our findings demonstrated the diverse range of uncertainty specifications in tuna stock assessments, and revealed the important role of subjective factors in making these selections. We propose some best practices for specifying uncertainty to enhance consistency and reducing subjectivity across tuna stock assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fish and Fisheries
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70077
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversity and Subjectivity of Model Uncertainty Specification in Global Tuna Stock Assessment

Jie Zhu, Runze Wang, André E. Punt, Sisong Dong et al.
Fish and Fisheries
Marine and fisheries research
article

Diversity and Subjectivity of Model Uncertainty Specification in Global Tuna Stock Assessment

Jie Zhu, Runze Wang, André E. Punt, Sisong Dong, Fan Zhang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT As a major source of scientific uncertainty in stock assessments and fisheries management, model uncertainty in tuna stock assessments is primarily examined using sensitivity analysis and ensemble modelling. However, uncertainty specifications (i.e., factors and levels included in uncertainty analyses) for tuna assessments vary within and among tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (tRFMOs). We reviewed the uncertainty specification in 133 stock assessments conducted over the past 20 years by five tRFMOs, covering seven major commercial tuna species. Our analysis revealed four key findings: although a wide range of uncertainty specifications has been applied, only a few factors are commonly considered across assessments; patterns in uncertainty specification are more closely aligned with management organisation than with species; the emphasis on different factors has shifted over time (e.g., increasing attention to growth and decreasing focus on data weighting); and a change to the modelling platform is a key factor leading to changing uncertainty specifications between successive assessments. Our findings demonstrated the diverse range of uncertainty specifications in tuna stock assessments, and revealed the important role of subjective factors in making these selections. We propose some best practices for specifying uncertainty to enhance consistency and reducing subjectivity across tuna stock assessments.

Fish and Fisheries
University of Washington (US), China Fishery Machinery and Instrument Research Institute (CN), Shanghai Ocean University (CN)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Marine and fisheries research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.